Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24744992›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2014

Phase II Trial of Erlotinib during and after Radiotherapy in Children with Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Gliomas.

Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Mehmet Kocak, Atmaram S Pai Panandiker, Gregory T Armstrong, Cynthia Wetmore, John R Crawford, Tong Lin, James M Boyett, Larry E Kun, Fredrick A Boop and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Autophagy as a Potential Therapy for Malignant Glioma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. New perspectives in glioblastoma antiangiogenic therapy.Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland) · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim QaddoumiDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center , Memphis, TN , USA.
Mehmet KocakDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
Atmaram S Pai PanandikerDepartment of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
Gregory T ArmstrongDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
Cynthia WetmoreDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center , Memphis, TN , USA.
John R CrawfordDepartment of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego , San Diego, CA , USA.
Tong LinDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
James M BoyettDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
Larry E KunDepartment of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
Fredrick A BoopSemmes-Murphey Neurologic and Spine Institute , Memphis, TN , USA.
Thomas E MerchantDepartment of Radiological Sciences, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
David W EllisonDepartment of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA.
Amar GajjarDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center , Memphis, TN , USA.
Alberto BroniscerDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital , Memphis, TN , USA ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center , Memphis, TN , USA.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · USSemmes Murphey Foundation · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
The DNA Damage Response and Tumorigenesis in the BrainP01CA096832 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, SUZANNE J. · 2003 to 2025
$38.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA096832NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor is overexpressed in most pediatric high-grade gliomas (HGG). Since erlotinib had shown activity in adults with HGG, we conducted a phase II trial of erlotinib and local radiotherapy (RT) in children with newly diagnosed HGG.

methodsFollowing maximum surgical resection, patients between 3 and 21 years with non-metastatic HGG received local RT at 59.4 Gy (54 Gy for spinal tumors and those with ≥70% brain involvement). Erlotinib started on day 1 of RT (120 mg/m(2) per day) and continued for 2 years unless there was tumor progression or intolerable toxicities. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated for patients with intracranial anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma (GBM).

resultsMedian age at diagnosis for 41 patients with intracranial tumors (21 with GBM and 20 with AA) was 10.9 years (range, 3.3-19 years). The 2-year PFS for patients with AA and GBM was 15 ± 7 and 19 ± 8%, respectively. Only five patients remained alive without tumor progression. Twenty-six patients had at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity irrespective of association with erlotinib; only four required dose modifications. The main toxicities were gastrointestinal (n = 11), dermatologic (n = 5), and metabolic (n = 4). One patient with gliomatosis cerebri who required prolonged corticosteroids died of septic shock associated with pancreatitis.

conclusionAlthough therapy with erlotinib was mostly well-tolerated, it did not change the poor outcome of our patients. Our results showed that erlotinib is not a promising medication in the treatment of children with intracranial AA and GBM.

Indexed as

epidermal growth factor receptorerlotinibhigh-grade gliomapediatricphase IIradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID24744992
PMCPMC3978340
OpenAlexW2061087249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.