ArticleNeurology international2014
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: differences between pregnant and non-pregnant patients.
Article in Neurology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of intensive care unit admission in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome patients with preeclampsia or eclampsia: a 10-year retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- A systematic review of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in pregnant women with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia.Obstetric medicine · 2023Article
- Serum Neurofilament Light: a Potential Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Obstetric Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome.Molecular neurobiology · 2021Article
- Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome due to adrenal pheochromocytoma: A case report and literature review.Medicine · 2020Review
- Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, preeclampsia or stroke? A diagnostic dilemma.BMJ case reports · 2019Article
- Atypical case of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome related to late onset postpartum eclampsia: A case report.Medicine · 2019Article
- An Uncommon Cause of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome Related to Antibiotic Ingestion.Cureus · 2018Article
- Effect of blood pressure on reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in pre-eclampsia or eclampsia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2018Article
- A study on clinicoradiological characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome in preeclampsia or eclampsia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2017Article
- Anti-Angiogenic Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome: Could Hypomagnesaemia Be the Trigger?Drug safety · 2017Review
- Malignant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Case of Posterior Irreversible Encephalopathy Syndrome.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2016Article
- An unusual case of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in a patient being weaned from intrathecal morphine.International medical case reports journal · 2016Article
- Delayed diagnosis of PRES and eclampsia in a concealed pregnancy.The Pan African medical journal · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a clinical-radiologic entity not yet understood, that presents with transient neurologic symptoms and particular radiological findings. Few papers show the differences between pregnant and non-pregnant patients. We review the cases of 38 women diagnosed with PRES, in order to find significant differences between pregnant (18) and non-pregnant (20) patients. We found differences among the age of patients (25.83 years old in pregnant and 29.31 years old in non pregnant; P=0.001); in the mean of highest systolic blood pressure, that was higher in non-pregnant group (185:162 mmHg; P=0.121); and in creatinine levels that was higher in non-pregnant group (3.47:1.04 mg/dL; P=0.001). To our knowledge, just a few papers analyzed whether PRES syndrome presented in the same way in pregnant and non-pregnant patients. The differences and the possible pathophisiology of this syndrome still remain enigmatic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.