Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24744394›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2014

Porcine skeletal muscle-derived multipotent PW1pos/Pax7neg interstitial cells: isolation, characterization, and long-term culture.

Fiona C Lewis, Beverley J Henning, Giovanna Marazzi, David Sassoon, Georgina M Ellison, Bernardo Nadal-Ginard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Adult stem cells at work: regenerating skeletal muscle.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Transplantation of Allogeneic PW1JACC. Basic to translational science · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fiona C LewisCentre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences and Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Unit (BioStem), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool JM University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Myology Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche S 787 INSERM, Université Paris VI/Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Beverley J HenningCentre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences and Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Unit (BioStem), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool JM University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Myology Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche S 787 INSERM, Université Paris VI/Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Giovanna MarazziCentre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences and Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Unit (BioStem), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool JM University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Myology Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche S 787 INSERM, Université Paris VI/Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
David SassoonCentre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences and Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Unit (BioStem), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool JM University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Myology Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche S 787 INSERM, Université Paris VI/Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Georgina M EllisonCentre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences and Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Unit (BioStem), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool JM University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Myology Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche S 787 INSERM, Université Paris VI/Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France georgina.ellison@kcl.ac.uk bernardo.nadalginard@kcl.ac.uk.
Bernardo Nadal-GinardCentre of Human and Aerospace Physiological Sciences and Centre for Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology Unit (BioStem), Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool JM University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; Myology Group, Unité Mixte de Recherche S 787 INSERM, Université Paris VI/Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France georgina.ellison@kcl.ac.uk bernardo.nadalginard@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBInserm · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing effective strategies for the regeneration of solid tissue requires an understanding of the biology underlying the tissue's endogenous repair mechanisms. PW1/Peg3(pos)/Pax7(neg) skeletal muscle-derived interstitial progenitor cells (PICs) were first identified recently in the interstitium of murine skeletal muscle and shown to contribute to muscle fiber regeneration in vivo. PICs, therefore, represent a novel candidate resident progenitor cell for muscle regeneration. To explore the potential of these cells for clinical translation, we must ascertain the presence of PICs in larger mammalian species and identify criteria to successfully isolate and expand this population. In this study, we report the isolation, characterization, and maintenance of multipotent PICs from juvenile porcine skeletal muscle. We show that porcine PICs can be reproducibly isolated from skeletal muscle, express stem/progenitor cell markers, and have a stable phenotype and karyotype through multiple passages. Furthermore, porcine PICs are clonogenic and multipotent, giving rise to skeletal myoblast/myotubes, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells. In addition, PICs can be induced to differentiate into cardiomyocyte-like cells. These results demonstrate, in an animal model with size and physiology extrapolatable to the human, that porcine skeletal muscle-derived PW1(pos)/Pax7(neg) PICs are a source of stem/progenitor cells. These findings open new avenues for a variety of solid tissue engineering and regeneration using a single multipotent stem cell type isolated from an easily accessible source, such as skeletal muscle.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationMuscle DevelopmentAdipogenesisAnimalsAntigens, CD34BiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell SeparationEndothelial CellsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalKaryotypeKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLeukocyte Common AntigensMultipotent Stem CellsAntigens, CD34BiomarkersKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLeukocyte Common AntigensPAX7 Transcription FactorInterstitial cellsMultipotentPorcinePW1Skeletal muscleStem cells

Identifiers

PMID24744394
PMCPMC4039454
OpenAlexW2023303034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.