Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24744319›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutrition2014

Caffeine and alcohol intakes and overall nutrient adequacy are associated with longitudinal cognitive performance among U.S. adults.

May A Beydoun, Alyssa A Gamaldo, Hind A Beydoun, Toshiko Tanaka, Katherine L Tucker, Sameera A Talegawkar, Luigi Ferrucci, Alan B Zonderman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

May A BeydounIntramural Research Program (NIA/NIH/IRP), National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD baydounm@mail.nih.gov.
Alyssa A GamaldoIntramural Research Program (NIA/NIH/IRP), National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
Hind A BeydounGraduate Program in Public Health, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.
Toshiko TanakaIntramural Research Program (NIA/NIH/IRP), National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD.
Katherine L TuckerUniversity of Massachusetts at Lowell, Lowell, MA; and.
Sameera A TalegawkarDepartment of International Health, Center for Human Nutrition, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Luigi FerrucciIntramural Research Program (NIA/NIH/IRP), National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD.
Alan B ZondermanIntramural Research Program (NIA/NIH/IRP), National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD.
National Institute on Aging · USEastern Virginia Medical School · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

The Baltimore Longitudinal Study Of AgingZIAAG000015 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI SIMONSICK, ELEANOR MARIE · 2009 to 2025
$116.9M
Age-associated cognitive changes in community dwelling adultsZIAAG000195 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI ZONDERMAN, ALAN B · 2009 to 2019
$9.3M
The Aging Genome Association Study "AGE-GAIN"ZIAAG000965 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI FERRUCCI, LUIGI · 2009 to 2025
$4.0M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among modifiable lifestyle factors, diet may affect cognitive health. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations may exist between dietary exposures [e.g., caffeine (mg/d), alcohol (g/d), and nutrient adequacy] and cognitive performance and change over time. This was a prospective cohort study, the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 628-1305 persons depending on the cognitive outcome; ∼2 visits/person). Outcomes included 10 cognitive scores, spanning various domains of cognition. Caffeine and alcohol intakes and a nutrient adequacy score (NAS) were estimated from 7-d food diaries. Among key findings, caffeine intake was associated with better baseline global cognition among participants with a baseline age (Agebase) of ≥70 y. A higher NAS was associated with better baseline global cognition performance (overall, women, Agebase <70 y), better baseline verbal memory (immediate and delayed recall, Agebase ≥70 y), and slower rate of decline or faster improvement in the attention domain (women). For an Agebase of <70 y, alcohol consumption was associated with slower improvement on letter fluency and global cognition over time. Conversely, for an Agebase of ≥70 y and among women, alcohol intake was related to better baseline attention and working memory. In sum, patterns of diet and cognition associations indicate stratum-specific associations by sex and baseline age. The general observed trend was that of putative beneficial effects of caffeine intake and nutrient adequacy on domains of global cognition, verbal memory, and attention, and mixed effects of alcohol on domains of letter fluency, attention, and working memory. Further longitudinal studies conducted on larger samples of adults are needed to determine whether dietary factors individually or in combination are modifiers of cognitive trajectories among adults.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlcohol DrinkingAttentionCaffeineCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesDietDiet RecordsFemaleFood QualityHumansLife StyleCaffeine

Identifiers

PMID24744319
PMCPMC4018952
OpenAlexW2109268263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.