SynthesisObesity surgery2014
Measurement of disordered eating following bariatric surgery: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Development of Feeding and Eating Disorders after Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2021Pooled it
- Improvement in Food Intolerance Resulting from Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass after Speech Therapy Intervention in Chewing.Obesity surgery · 2019Trial
- Translation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Arabic Version of the Eating Disorders After Bariatric Surgery Questionnaire (EDABS‑Q‑Arabic18).Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- New understandings meet old treatments: putting a contemporary face on established protocols.Journal of eating disorders · 2024Article
- Management of eating disorders for people with higher weight: clinical practice guideline.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Article
- Gut-brain mechanisms underlying changes in disordered eating behaviour after bariatric surgery: a review.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2022Review
- Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the eating disorder examination in the longitudinal assessment of bariatric surgery study.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2022Article
- Disordered eating following bariatric surgery: a review of measurement and conceptual considerations.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2021Review
- Indications for Surgery for Obesity and Weight-Related Diseases: Position Statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO).Obesity surgery · 2016Article
- Perception of control over eating after bariatric surgery for super-obesity--a 2-year follow-up study.Obesity surgery · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Disordered eating is elevated in bariatric surgery patients and is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes. A systematic review evaluated the definitions and measurement methods used to identify and assess disordered eating in patients following bariatric surgery. One hundred articles were identified featuring 35 questionnaires and 23 interviews. There were numerous variations to diagnostic criteria and amendments to measures to account for the post-surgical eating context. Only 20% of questionnaires and 4% of interviews had reported psychometric evaluation in post-surgery samples. Results highlight the need for a consistent definition of disordered eating and for current assessment measures to be (a) adapted to account for the altered gastrointestinal system in patients following surgery and (b) psychometrically evaluated in bariatric surgery patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24744189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.