Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24743955›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2014

New therapies for non-cardiac chest pain.

Carla Maradey-Romero, Ronnie Fass

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Diagnosis and Management of Functional Chest Pain in the Rome IV Era.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Proton Pump Inhibitor Non-Responder: A Clinical Conundrum.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2015
    Article
  8. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: an evolving treatment for achalasia.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Treatment of esophageal motility disorders based on the chicago classification.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2014
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carla Maradey-RomeroThe Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Case Western Reserve University, MetroHealth Medical Center, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, OH, 44109-1998, USA.
Ronnie Fass
Case Western Reserve University · USMetroHealth Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After excluding a cardiac cause, potent anti-reflux therapy should be administered to patients with non-cardiac chest pain since gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common underlying mechanism of this disorder. If GERD is an unlikely cause of patient's symptoms, an esophageal motor disorder should be excluded. Spastic motility disorders can be treated with a smooth muscle relaxant (such as calcium channel blocker, nitrate, or phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors). Alternatively, spastic motility disorders may respond to anti-spasmodics, pain modulators, botulinum toxin injection into the distal esophagus, and/or surgery. Patients with functional chest pain have recently seen an expanded treatment armamentarium including medications such as trazadone, tricyclic anti-depressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, pregabalin, and/or ramelteon.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAntidepressive AgentsBotulinum ToxinsChest PainEsophageal Motility DisordersEsophagusGastroesophageal RefluxHumansAnalgesicsAntidepressive AgentsBotulinum Toxins

Identifiers

PMID24743955
OpenAlexW2022502347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.