ReviewHerz2014
Clinical evaluation and risk stratification in patients with syncope.
Review in Herz, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Reflex syncope and syncope secondary to orthostatic hypotension].Der Internist · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Syncope accounts for approximately 1 % of visits to emergency departments. The first diagnostic step is to rule out nonsyncopal conditions as a cause of the transient loss of consciousness. Next, the basic clinical evaluation should identify patients at high risk for potentially life-threatening events. These patients should be admitted and monitored until a diagnosis is made and definitive treatment can be offered. Guided by the basic evaluation findings, specific tests should be performed to prove or rule out the suspected diagnosis. In low-risk patients, this should preferably be done in an outpatient setting. To date, there is no consensus on a structured algorithm for the evaluation of patients with syncope. Therefore, it seems beneficial to formulate an algorithm based on the current guidelines for the management of syncope for use in the clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.