Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24743901›Full record

SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2014

Reducing the risk of infection for transrectal prostate biopsy with povidone-iodine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chunxiao Pu, Yunjin Bai, Haichao Yuan, Jinhong Li, Yin Tang, Jia Wang, Qiang Wei, Ping Han

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Povidone-iodine for transrectal prostate biopsy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Infection complications after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A radiology department's experience and strategy for improvement.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A New Nomogram Allowing Physicians to Predict Patients at High Risk of Fever Occurring After Prostate Biopsy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. TransperinealTranslational andrology and urology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chunxiao PuDepartment of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guoxue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yunjin Bai
Haichao Yuan
Jinhong Li
Yin Tang
Jia Wang
Qiang Wei
Ping Han
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy of povidone-iodine (PI) in reducing the risk of infectious complications following transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB).

methodsEligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from electronic databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE). The database search, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The main outcome for the efficacy of PI was the incidence of infectious complications after TRPB.

resultsSeven trials, including 2,049 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Data from the seven included RCTs favored the use of PI before TRPB to prevent infectious complications. PI for "PI versus blank control" significantly reduced fever, bacteriuria, and bacteremia compared with that for control [relative risk (RR) 0.31; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.45, P < 0.00001]. With PI versus antibiotics (ATB), patients treated with ATB alone had a significantly greater risk of bacteremia (RR 0.38; 95 % CI 0.16-0.90, P = 0.03). In "PI plus ATB versus ATB" trials, the risk of fever (RR 0.11; 95 % CI 0.02-0.85, P = 0.03) and bacteremia (RR 0.25; 95 % CI 0.08-0.75, P = 0.01) was diminished in the "PI plus ATB" group.

conclusionsRectal disinfection with PI provides a safe and effective method to reduce the risk of infectious complications following TRPB, regardless of mono-prophylaxis and combined prophylaxis with PI and ATB. Large, multicenter, and prospective RCTs of good quality trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of PI.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalBacterial InfectionsBiopsyHumansMalePovidone-IodineProstateRectumRiskAnti-Infective Agents, LocalPovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID24743901
OpenAlexW2064229150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.