ArticlePLoS genetics2014
Genome-wide diet-gene interaction analyses for risk of colorectal cancer.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Recommendations Around Frameworks for Evaluating Scientific Validity in Nutritional Genomics.Frontiers in nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- Gene-environment interactions and colorectal cancer risk: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.International journal of cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Dietary Inflammatory Index and Site-Specific Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Pooled it
- Health risk factors associated with meat, fruit and vegetable consumption in cohort studies: A comprehensive meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- A gene-diet interaction-based score predicts response to dietary fat in the Women's Health Initiative.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020Trial
- Shaping the future of early-onset colorectal cancer prevention.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2026Review
- Is Male Hypogonadism a Risk Factor for Cancer Through Weakening of the Immune System?International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- LncRNA GATA3-AS1-mediated miR-2116-5p interaction modulates TCF12 and contributes to podocyte dysfunction in childhood nephrotic syndrome.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- TGF-β Pathway-Based Polygenic Risk Score Modifies the Association between Red Meat Intake and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Application of a Novel Pathway-Based PRS Method.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026Article
- Interactions Between Dietary Metabolites and Regulatory Risk Variants for Human Colon Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Red meat intake interacts with a TGF-β-pathway-based polygenic risk score to impact colorectal cancer risk: Application of a novel approach for polygenic risk score construction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Decoding the genetic and environmental forces in propelling the surge of early-onset colorectal cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Multi-omics approaches for understanding gene-environment interactions in noncommunicable diseases: techniques, translation, and equity issues.Human genomics · 2025Review
- From laboratory to clinic: opportunities and challenges of functional food active ingredients in cancer therapy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Microbiota-derived metabolites in tumorigenesis: mechanistic insights and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- A new test for trait mean and variance detects unreported loci for blood-pressure variation.American journal of human genetics · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Analyses to Understand the Relationship between Red Meat and Processed Meat Intake and Colorectal Cancer Risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Genome-Wide Interaction Study of Dietary Intake and Colorectal Cancer Risk in the UK Biobank.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Research gaps and opportunities in precision nutrition: an NIH workshop report.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2022Article
- Diet quality, common genetic polymorphisms, and bladder cancer risk in a New England population-based study.European journal of nutrition · 2022Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors at 20 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Dietary factors, including meat, fruits, vegetables and fiber, are associated with colorectal cancer; however, there is limited information as to whether these dietary factors interact with genetic variants to modify risk of colorectal cancer. We tested interactions between these dietary factors and approximately 2.7 million genetic variants for colorectal cancer risk among 9,287 cases and 9,117 controls from ten studies. We used logistic regression to investigate multiplicative gene-diet interactions, as well as our recently developed Cocktail method that involves a screening step based on marginal associations and gene-diet correlations and a testing step for multiplicative interactions, while correcting for multiple testing using weighted hypothesis testing. Per quartile increment in the intake of red and processed meat were associated with statistically significant increased risks of colorectal cancer and vegetable, fruit and fiber intake with lower risks. From the case-control analysis, we detected a significant interaction between rs4143094 (10p14/near GATA3) and processed meat consumption (OR = 1.17; p = 8.7E-09), which was consistently observed across studies (p heterogeneity = 0.78). The risk of colorectal cancer associated with processed meat was increased among individuals with the rs4143094-TG and -TT genotypes (OR = 1.20 and OR = 1.39, respectively) and null among those with the GG genotype (OR = 1.03). Our results identify a novel gene-diet interaction with processed meat for colorectal cancer, highlighting that diet may modify the effect of genetic variants on disease risk, which may have important implications for prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.