Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24743342›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Genome-wide profiling of yeast DNA:RNA hybrid prone sites with DRIP-chip.

Yujia A Chan, Maria J Aristizabal, Phoebe Y T Lu, Zongli Luo, Akil Hamza, Michael S Kobor, Peter C Stirling, Philip Hieter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthetic lethal mutants inJournal of bacteriology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Mechanisms underlining R-loop biology and implications for human disease.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yujia A ChanMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Maria J AristizabalCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Phoebe Y T LuCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.
Zongli LuoWine Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Akil HamzaMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Michael S KoborCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Child and Family Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Peter C StirlingDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Terry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Philip HieterMichael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Child and Family Research Institute · CACanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CABC Cancer Agency · CA

Funding

Functional Determinants of Chromosome SegregationR01CA158162 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI HIETER, PHILIP A. · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
CIHR MOP-119372CIHR MOP-119383CIHR MOP-38096NCI NIH HHS R01: 4R01CA158162NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

dnaRNA hybrid formation is emerging as a significant cause of genome instability in biological systems ranging from bacteria to mammals. Here we describe the genome-wide distribution of DNA:RNA hybrid prone loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) followed by hybridization on tiling microarray. These profiles show that DNA:RNA hybrids preferentially accumulated at rDNA, Ty1 and Ty2 transposons, telomeric repeat regions and a subset of open reading frames (ORFs). The latter are generally highly transcribed and have high GC content. Interestingly, significant DNA:RNA hybrid enrichment was also detected at genes associated with antisense transcripts. The expression of antisense-associated genes was also significantly altered upon overexpression of RNase H, which degrades the RNA in hybrids. Finally, we uncover mutant-specific differences in the DRIP profiles of a Sen1 helicase mutant, RNase H deletion mutant and Hpr1 THO complex mutant compared to wild type, suggesting different roles for these proteins in DNA:RNA hybrid biology. Our profiles of DNA:RNA hybrid prone loci provide a resource for understanding the properties of hybrid-forming regions in vivo, extend our knowledge of hybrid-mitigating enzymes, and contribute to models of antisense-mediated gene regulation. A summary of this paper was presented at the 26th International Conference on Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology, August 2013.

Indexed as

Antisense Elements (Genetics)DNA, FungalDNA HelicasesDNA, RibosomalGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenome-Wide Association StudyImmunoprecipitationNuclear ProteinsNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOpen Reading FramesRecombination, GeneticRetroelementsRibonuclease HRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAntisense Elements (Genetics)DNA, FungalDNA HelicasesDNA, RibosomalHPR1 protein, S cerevisiaeNuclear ProteinsRetroelementsRibonuclease HRNA, FungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24743342
PMCPMC3990523
OpenAlexW2047123954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.