Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24743218›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2014

Detection of minimal residual disease in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia by next-generation sequencing.

Stephen J Salipante, Jonathan R Fromm, Jay Shendure, Brent L Wood, David Wu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. NPM1 Biology in Myeloid Neoplasia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Monitoring inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen J Salipante1] Departments of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, UW Hematopathology Laboratory at SCCA, Seattle, WA, USA [2] Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jonathan R FrommDepartments of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, UW Hematopathology Laboratory at SCCA, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jay ShendureGenome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brent L WoodDepartments of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, UW Hematopathology Laboratory at SCCA, Seattle, WA, USA.
David WuDepartments of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, UW Hematopathology Laboratory at SCCA, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Ultrasensitive identification and precise quantitation of low frequency somatic mR21CA160080 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHENDURE, JAY ASHOK · 2011 to 2013
$588k
NCI NIH HHS CA160080NCI NIH HHS R21 CA160080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of minimal residual disease predicts adverse outcome in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Currently, minimal residual disease may be detected by RQ-PCR or flow cytometry, both of which have practical and diagnostic limitations. Here, we describe a next-generation sequencing assay for minimal residual disease detection in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia, which encompasses ∼60% of patients with normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia. Exon 12 of NPM1 was PCR amplified using sequencing adaptor-linked primers and deep sequenced to enable detection of low-prevalence, acute myeloid leukemia-specific activating mutations. We benchmarked our results against flow cytometry, the standard of care for acute myeloid leukemia minimal residual disease diagnosis at our institution. The performance of both approaches was evaluated using defined dilutions of an NPM1 mutation-positive cell line and longitudinal clinical samples from acute myeloid leukemia patients. Using defined control material, we found this assay sensitive to approximately 0.001% mutant cells, outperforming flow cytometry by an order of magnitude. Next-generation sequencing was precise and semiquantitative over four orders of magnitude. In 22 longitudinal samples from six acute myeloid leukemia patients, next-generation sequencing detected minimal residual disease in all samples deemed negative by flow cytometry. Further, in one-third of patients, sequencing detected alternate NPM1 mutations in addition to the patient's index mutation, consistent with tumor heterogeneity. Next-generation sequencing provides information without prior knowledge of NPM1 mutation subtype or validation of allele-specific probes as required for RQ-PCR assays, and without generation and interpretation of complex multidimensional flow cytometry data. This approach may complement current technologies to enhance patient-specific clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMutationBiomarkers, TumorDNA Mutational AnalysisExonsFlow CytometryHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteNeoplasm, ResidualNuclear ProteinsNucleophosminPilot ProjectsPolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorNPM1 protein, humanNuclear ProteinsNucleophosmin

Identifiers

PMID24743218
PMCPMC4201902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.