Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24743112›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Opportunity cost for early treatment of Chagas disease in Mexico.

Janine M Ramsey, Miguel Elizondo-Cano, Gilberto Sanchez-González, Adriana Peña-Nieves, Alejandro Figueroa-Lara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The economic burden of Chagas disease: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Congenital Chagas Disease in the United States: Cost Savings through Maternal Screening.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Biosensors to Diagnose Chagas Disease: A Brief Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
  17. Chagas Disease Infection among Migrants at the Mexico/Guatemala Border.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janine M RamseyRegional Center for Public Health Research, National Institute for Public Health Research, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Miguel Elizondo-CanoCenter for Research in Health Systems, National Institute for Public Health Research, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Gilberto Sanchez-GonzálezCenter for Research in Health Systems, National Institute for Public Health Research, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Adriana Peña-NievesSalud, Población y Economía AC, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro Figueroa-LaraEpidemiological Research Unit and Health Services, National Medical Center XXI Century, Mexican Social Security Institute, Mexico City, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXMexican Social Security Institute · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven current neglect for Chagas disease in public health programs in Mexico, future healthcare and economic development policies will need a more robust model to analyze costs and impacts of timely clinical attention of infected populations. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsA Markov decision model was constructed to simulate the natural history of a Chagas disease cohort in Mexico and to project the associated short and long-term clinical outcomes and corresponding costs. The lifetime cost for a timely diagnosed and treated Chagas disease patient is US$ 10,160, while the cost for an undiagnosed individual is US$ 11,877. The cost of a diagnosed and treated case increases 24-fold from early acute to indeterminate stage. The major cost component for lifetime cost was working days lost, between 44% and 75%, depending on the program scenario for timely diagnosis and treatment. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In the long term, it is cheaper to diagnose and treat chagasic patients early, instead of doing nothing. This finding by itself argues for the need to shift current policy, in order to prioritize and attend this neglected disease for the benefit of social and economic development, which implies including treatment drugs in the national formularies. Present results are even more relevant, if one considers that timely diagnosis and treatment can arrest clinical progression and enhance a chronic patient's quality of life.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsChagas DiseaseCohort StudiesEarly DiagnosisHealth Care CostsHumansMexicoSecondary PreventionAntiprotozoal Agents

Identifiers

PMID24743112
PMCPMC3990484
OpenAlexW2012853340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.