Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24743097›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

A general approach for haplotype phasing across the full spectrum of relatedness.

Jared O'Connell, Deepti Gurdasani, Olivier Delaneau, Nicola Pirastu, Sheila Ulivi, Massimiliano Cocca, Michela Traglia, Jie Huang, Jennifer E Huffman, Igor Rudan and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 385 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
385citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

385 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Association analysis between genetic nurturing effects ofBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

325 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Jared O'ConnellWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Deepti GurdasaniWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Olivier DelaneauDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nicola PirastuInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Sheila UliviInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
Massimiliano CoccaDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Michela TragliaDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Jie HuangWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Jennifer E HuffmanMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Igor RudanCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ruth McQuillanCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ross M FraserCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Harry CampbellCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ozren PolasekFaculty of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
Gershim AsikiMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute (MRC/UVRI), Uganda Research Unit on AIDS, Entebbe, Uganda.
Kenneth EkoruLaboratoire Génomique, Bioinformatique, et Applications (EA4627), Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris, France.
Caroline HaywardMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Alan F WrightMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Veronique VitartMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Pau NavarroMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jean-Francois ZaguryLaboratoire Génomique, Bioinformatique, et Applications (EA4627), Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris, France.
James F WilsonCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Daniela TonioloDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Paolo GaspariniInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Nicole SoranzoWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Manjinder S SandhuWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jonathan MarchiniWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZB/4/710Medical Research Council G0801823Medical Research Council G0901213Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127561128Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127592696Medical Research Council MR/K013491/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 090058/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many existing cohorts contain a range of relatedness between genotyped individuals, either by design or by chance. Haplotype estimation in such cohorts is a central step in many downstream analyses. Using genotypes from six cohorts from isolated populations and two cohorts from non-isolated populations, we have investigated the performance of different phasing methods designed for nominally 'unrelated' individuals. We find that SHAPEIT2 produces much lower switch error rates in all cohorts compared to other methods, including those designed specifically for isolated populations. In particular, when large amounts of IBD sharing is present, SHAPEIT2 infers close to perfect haplotypes. Based on these results we have developed a general strategy for phasing cohorts with any level of implicit or explicit relatedness between individuals. First SHAPEIT2 is run ignoring all explicit family information. We then apply a novel HMM method (duoHMM) to combine the SHAPEIT2 haplotypes with any family information to infer the inheritance pattern of each meiosis at all sites across each chromosome. This allows the correction of switch errors, detection of recombination events and genotyping errors. We show that the method detects numbers of recombination events that align very well with expectations based on genetic maps, and that it infers far fewer spurious recombination events than Merlin. The method can also detect genotyping errors and infer recombination events in otherwise uninformative families, such as trios and duos. The detected recombination events can be used in association scans for recombination phenotypes. The method provides a simple and unified approach to haplotype estimation, that will be of interest to researchers in the fields of human, animal and plant genetics.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingCohort EffectFamilyGenotypeHaplotypesHumansModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypeRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID24743097
PMCPMC3990520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.