Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24743008›Full record

Trial reportObesity research & clinical practice

The impact of physician weight discussion on weight loss in US adults.

Andrew C Pool, Jennifer L Kraschnewski, Lindsay A Cover, Erik B Lehman, Heather L Stuckey, Kevin O Hwang, Kathryn I Pollak, Christopher N Sciamanna

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity research & clinical practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Obesity and cardiovascular health.European journal of preventive cardiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Culinary Medicine for Family Medicine Residents.Medical science educator · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew C PoolDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Jennifer L KraschnewskiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Lindsay A CoverDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Erik B LehmanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Heather L StuckeyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Kevin O HwangDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Kathryn I PollakDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Christopher N SciamannaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000127 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$17.1M
PENN STATE CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033184 · NCRR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2011 to 2011
$4.5M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2TR000126 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2012 to 2015
$3.2M
Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteKL2RR033180 · NCRR · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI SINOWAY, LAWRENCE I · 2011 to 2011
$852k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000126NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000127NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR033180NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR033180NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033184NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR033184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemThe increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States and worldwide is at epidemic levels. Physicians may play a vital role in addressing this epidemic. We aimed to examine the association of a physician's discussion of patients’ weight status with self-reported weight loss. We hypothesized that physician discussion of patients’ being overweight is associated with increased weight loss in patients with overweight and obesity.

methodsData analysis of participants (n = 5054) in the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey (NHANES) in 2005-2008. The main outcome was rates of self-reported weight loss and the association with physicians’ discussion of their patients’ weight status.

resultsOverweight and obese participants were significantly more likely to report a 5% weight loss in the past year if their doctor had told them they were overweight (adjusted OR (AOR) 1.88; 95% CI 1.45-2.44; AOR 1.79; 95% CI 1.30-2.46, respectively).

conclusionsPhysicians’ direct discussion of their patients’ weight status is associated with clinically significant patient weight loss and may be a targetable intervention. Further studies are needed to determine if increasing physician discussion of patients’ weight status leads to significant weight loss.

Indexed as

Directive CounselingPhysician-Patient RelationsReferral and ConsultationWeight LossAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelBody Mass IndexCommunicationFemaleHealth BehaviorHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMotivation

Identifiers

PMID24743008
PMCPMC4264677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.