Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24742823›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2014

MET aberrations and c-MET inhibitors in patients with gastric and esophageal cancers in a phase I unit.

Denis L Fontes Jardim, Debora de Melo Gagliato, Gerald S Falchook, Filip Janku, Ralph Zinner, Jennifer J Wheler, Vivek Subbiah, Sarina A Piha-Paul, Siqing Fu, Mariela Blum Murphy and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Predictive biomarkers in gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  4. Clinical significance ofChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. c-Met as a Target for Personalized Therapy.Translational oncogenomics · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denis L Fontes JardimDepartment of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Debora de Melo Gagliato
Gerald S Falchook
Filip Janku
Ralph Zinner
Jennifer J Wheler
Vivek Subbiah
Sarina A Piha-Paul
Siqing Fu
Mariela Blum Murphy
Jaffer Ajani
Chad Tang
Kenneth Hess
Stanley R Hamilton
Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
Razelle Kurzrock
Funda Meric-Bernstam
David S Hong
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to investigate the demographics and tumor-associated features in patients with gastroesophageal (GE) malignancies referred to our Phase I Program who had formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue from archival or new biopsies tested for MET mutation and/or amplification. MET amplification was found in 5 of 76 (6.6%) patients (3/34 [8.8%] esophageal, 2/26 [7.7%] gastric and none in 22 gastroesophageal junction cancers). The only MET mutation detected in 3 of 41 (7.3%) patients was N375S. No demographic and histologic characteristics were associated with specific MET abnormalities. Median overall survival was 3 and 5 months for patients with and without a MET alteration, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 5.5; P=.14). Sixteen of 81 (20%) patients were enrolled in a c-MET inhibitor trial. Best responses were stable disease in 3 patients (19%), including a patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma that remained on the trial for 9.9 months (wild-type for MET abnormality). All tumors with MET abnormality (n=3) progressed on a c-MET inhibitor in fewer than 2 months. In conclusion, MET abnormalities can be found in a small group of patients with GE adenocarcinoma and further studies are necessary to better characterize the prognostic and predictive impact of MET alterations.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleGene AmplificationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsDNA, NeoplasmMET protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-met

Identifiers

PMID24742823
PMCPMC4039117
OpenAlexW2121867519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.