Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24742755›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anxiety disorders2014

Adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies: interactive effects during CBT for social anxiety disorder.

Amelia Aldao, Hooria Jazaieri, Philippe R Goldin, James J Gross

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anxiety disorders, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amelia AldaoPsychology Department, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43215, United States. Electronic address: amealdao@gmail.com.
Hooria JazaieriInstitute of Personality and Social Research, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, 4152 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, United States. Electronic address: hooria@berkeley.edu.
Philippe R GoldinDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Building 420, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, United States. Electronic address: pgoldin@stanford.edu.
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2130, United States. Electronic address: gross@stanford.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

fMRI of Emotional Reactivity, Cognitive Regulation, and CBT for Social PhobiaR01MH076074 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GROSS, JAMES J · 2006 to 2010
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been a increasing interest in understanding emotion regulation deficits in social anxiety disorder (SAD; e.g., Hofmann, Sawyer, Fang, & Asnaani, 2012). However, much remains to be understood about the patterns of associations among regulation strategies in the repertoire. Doing so is important in light of the growing recognition that people's ability to flexibly implement strategies is associated with better mental health (e.g., Kashdan et al., 2014). Based on previous work (Aldao & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2012), we examined whether putatively adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies interacted with each other in the prediction of social anxiety symptoms in a sample of 71 participants undergoing CBT for SAD. We found that strategies interacted with each other and that this interaction was qualified by a three-way interaction with a contextual factor, namely treatment study phase. Consequently, these findings underscore the importance of modeling contextual factors when seeking to understand emotion regulation deficits in SAD.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyEmotionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhobic DisordersTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAdaptive regulation strategiesCognitive behavioral therapyEmotion regulationMaladaptive regulation strategiesSocial anxiety

Identifiers

PMID24742755
PMCPMC4089517
OpenAlexW2149676985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.