Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24742330›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

Somatostatin receptor expression in Merkel cell carcinoma as target for molecular imaging.

Kristina Buder, Constantin Lapa, Michael C Kreissl, Andreas Schirbel, Ken Herrmann, Alexander Schnack, Eva-Bettina Bröcker, Matthias Goebeler, Andreas K Buck, Jürgen C Becker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2018
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. SSTR Antagonists as Theranostic Option in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Now you see me: lights on Merkel Cell Carcinoma.European journal of hybrid imaging · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. EJNMMI research · 2018
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristina BuderDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, 97080 Würzburg, Germany. Buder_K@ukw.de.
Constantin Lapa
Michael C Kreissl
Andreas Schirbel
Ken Herrmann
Alexander Schnack
Eva-Bettina Bröcker
Matthias Goebeler
Andreas K Buck
Jürgen C Becker
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cutaneous neoplasm with increasing incidence, aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are expressed in MCC and represent a potential target for both imaging and treatment.

methodsTo non-invasively assess SSTR expression in MCC using PET and the radiotracers [68Ga]DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide (DOTATOC) or -octreotate (DOTATATE) as surrogate for tumor burden. In 24 patients with histologically proven MCC SSTR-PET was performed and compared to results of computed tomography (CT).

resultsSSTR-PET detected primary and metastatic MCC lesions. On a patient-based analysis, sensitivity of SSTR-PET was 73% for nodal metastases, 100% for bone, and 67% for soft-tissue metastases, respectively. Notably, brain metastases were initially detected by SSTR-PET in 2 patients, whereas liver and lung metastases were diagnosed exclusively by CT. SSTR-PET showed concordance to CT results in 20 out of 24 patients. Four patients (17%) were up-staged due to SSTR-PET and patient management was changed in 3 patients (13%).

conclusionSSTR-PET showed high sensitivity for imaging bone, soft tissue and brain metastases, and particularly in combination with CT had a significant impact on clinical stage and patient management.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Merkel CellFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiddle AgedOctreotidePositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatinEdotreotideOctreotideRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatin

Identifiers

PMID24742330
PMCPMC4021101
OpenAlexW2073633714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.