ArticleAIDS patient care and STDs2014
HIV testing trends: Southeastern Pennsylvania, 2002-2010.
Article in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Both neighborhood and individual-level social cohesion are associated with testing for HIV in Southeastern Pennsylvania adult population.Annals of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Race/Sex Interactions and HIV Testing Among College Students.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2017Article
- Trends in HIV Testing among Adults in Georgia: Analysis of the 2011-2015 BRFSS Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Opt-Out Chlamydia Testing for High-Risk Young Women in the U.S.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016Article
- Factors Associated with Time Since Last HIV Test Among Persons at High Risk for HIV Infection, National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010.AIDS patient care and STDs · 2015Article
- Update on the Epidemiology and Prevention of HIV/AIDS in the United States.Current epidemiology reports · 2015Article
- Dual-Routine HCV/HIV Testing: Seroprevalence and Linkage to Care in Four Community Health Centers in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There are limited data on HIV testing trends after 2006 when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) introduced opt-out HIV testing with the aims of identifying HIV-infected persons early and linking them to care. We used data from the Southeastern Pennsylvania Household Health Survey between 2002 and 2010 to evaluate HIV testing over time. 50,698 adult (≥18 years) survey respondents were included. HIV testing increased after the CDC recommendations: 42.1% of survey respondents received testing at least once in 2002 versus 51.4% in 2010, p<0.001. Testing trends increased among all demographic groups, but existing differences in testing before 2006 persisted after that year as follows: younger patients, racial/ethnic minorities, patients on Medicaid were all more likely to get tested than their counterparts. Blacks and patients seeking care in community health centers had the fastest rise in HIV testing. The probability of HIV testing in Blacks was 0.56 (95% CI 0.54-0.60) in 2002 and increased to 0.73 (0.70-0.76) by 2010. Patients seeking care in community health centers had a probability of HIV testing of 0.57 (0.47-0.66) in 2002, which increased to 0.69 (0.60-0.77) by 2010. In comparison, patients in private clinics had an HIV testing probability of 0.40 (0.36-0.43) in 2002 compared to 0.47 (0.40-0.54) in 2010. HIV testing is increasing, particularly among ethnic minorities and in community health centers. However, testing remains to be improved in that setting and across all clinic types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.