Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24742212›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2014

Physicians' propensity to discuss prognosis is associated with patients' awareness of prognosis for metastatic cancers.

Pang-Hsiang Liu, Mary Beth Landrum, Jane C Weeks, Haiden A Huskamp, Katherine L Kahn, Yulei He, Jennifer W Mack, Nancy L Keating

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Timing of prognostic discussions in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Promoting End-of-Life Discussions in Advanced Cancer: Effects of Patient Coaching and Question Prompt Lists.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2017
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Shared decision-making needs, barriers, and facilitators of patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer in the hospital: a multi-level, mixed-methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perception of prognosis and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: results of a multicentre observational study (eQuiPe).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Association between prognostic awareness and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pang-Hsiang Liu1 Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts.
Mary Beth Landrum
Jane C Weeks
Haiden A Huskamp
Katherine L Kahn
Yulei He
Jennifer W Mack
Nancy L Keating
Harvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

PROPENSITY SCORES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELSU01CA093344 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z., FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2011
$19.5M
Lung/Colon Cancer Outcomes--Cancer Research NetworkU01CA093332 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WEEKS, JANE C. · 2001 to 2008
$7.4M
RAND-UCLA CanCORS PDCR ApplicationU01CA093348 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI KAHN, KATHERINE LESLIE · 2001 to 2008
$7.3M
Cancer Care Outcomes Research &Surveillance ConsortiumU01CA093324 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z. · 2001 to 2008
$7.1M
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN END OF LIFE CARE--ACCESSU01CA093329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2008
$6.6M
NC Colorectal Cancer Care Outcomes Research StudyU01CA093326 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANDLER, ROBERT S. · 2001 to 2008
$4.3M
Lung Cancer Care Outcomes/Surveillance Consortium-IowaU01CA093339 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WALLACE, ROBERT BRUCE · 2001 to 2008
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01-CA093324NCI NIH HHS U01-CA093326NCI NIH HHS U01-CA093329NCI NIH HHS U01-CA093332NCI NIH HHS U01-CA093339NCI NIH HHS U01-CA093344NCI NIH HHS U01-CA093348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrognosis discussion is an essential component of informed decision-making. However, many terminally ill patients have a limited awareness of their prognosis and the causes are unclear.

objectiveTo explore the impact of physicians' propensity to discuss prognosis on advanced cancer patients' prognosis awareness.

designCancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance Consortium (CanCORS) study, a prospective cohort study with patient and physician surveys. SETTING/SUBJECTS: We investigated 686 patients with metastatic lung or colorectal cancer at diagnosis who participated in the CanCORS study and reported about their life expectancy. Data were linked to the physician survey from 486 physicians who were identified by these patients as filling important roles in their cancer care.

resultsFew patients with metastatic cancers (16.5%) reported an accurate awareness of their prognosis, defined as reporting a life expectancy of less than 2 years for lung cancer or less than 5 years for colorectal cancer. Patients whose most-important-doctor (in helping patient make decisions) reported discussing prognosis with terminally ill patients earlier were more likely than those whose doctors deferred these discussions to have an accurate prognosis awareness (adjusted proportion, 18.5% versus 7.6%; odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.39-7.52; p=0.006).

conclusionsFew patients with advanced cancer could articulate an accurate prognosis estimate, despite most having received chemotherapy and many physicians reported they would discuss prognosis early. Physicians' propensity to discuss prognosis earlier was associated with more accurate patient reports of prognosis. Enhancing the communication skills of providers with important roles in cancer care may help to improve cancer patients' understanding of their prognosis.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsTerminally IllTruth DisclosureAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlabamaAwarenessCaliforniaColorectal NeoplasmsCommunicationDecision MakingFemaleHumansIowaLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID24742212
PMCPMC4038989
OpenAlexW1988233827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.