Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24741552›Full record

ArticleNorth American journal of medical sciences2014

Ovarian granulosa cell tumor: clinical features, treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors.

Divya Khosla, Kislay Dimri, Awadhesh K Pandey, Rohit Mahajan, Romeeta Trehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American journal of medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Non-Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: How Much Do We Really Know?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. FOXO1 mitigates the SMAD3/FOXL2Journal of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Mutant FOXL2Cancer research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Divya KhoslaDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Kislay DimriDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Awadhesh K PandeyDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Rohit MahajanDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Romeeta TrehanDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Government Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGranulosa cell tumors are rare neoplasms characterized by long natural history and favorable prognosis.

aimsThe objective of this study was to determine the clinical presentation, treatment, outcome, and prognostic factors for patients of granulosa cell tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of 26 patients of granulosa cell tumor of ovary from 2002 to 2011 was carried out. The records of all patients were analyzed to determine clinical presentation, treatment, survival, and prognostic factors.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 50 years (range, 17-71 years). Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom. The median follow-up was 71.4 months (range, 21.6-149.9 months). The estimated 5 and 10 year overall survival (OS) was 84.6 and 72.5%, respectively. Event-free survival (EFS) was 76.5 and 52.9% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Advanced stage was significant independent poor prognostic indicator for both OS and EFS.

conclusionMajority of the patients with granulosa cell tumors of the ovary present in early stage. Surgery is the primary treatment modality for granulosa cell tumors. Advanced stage and presence of residual disease were associated with inferior survival, but only prospective studies can ascertain their definite role.

Indexed as

Granulosa cell tumorOvaryPrognosisSurvivalTreatment

Identifiers

PMID24741552
PMCPMC3978936
OpenAlexW2014816727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.