ArticleInternational journal of critical illness and injury science2014
Videolaryngoscopy.
Article in International journal of critical illness and injury science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04386356 (Airtraq Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Anaesthesia Trainee in Nepalese Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Airtraq Video Laryngoscope Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Anaesthesia Trainee in Nepalese Population: A Comparative Study
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the Effect of Left Head Rotation versus the Direct Epiglottis Lifting Technique on Glottic View during C-MAC Videolaryngoscopy in Patients with Difficult Airway.Annals of African medicine · 2026Trial
- Cuff inflation technique is better than Magill forceps technique to facilitate nasotracheal intubation guiding by GlideScope® video laryngoscope.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2022Trial
- A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.European journal of pediatrics · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Article
- Videolaryngoscopy is associated with a lower rate of double-lumen endotracheal tube malposition in thoracic surgery procedures, retrospective single-center study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of Difficult Airway with Dental Malocclusions during Laryngoscopy with Video Laryngoscopy in Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery :.Galen medical journal · 2025Article
- Use of video laryngoscope as a conduit for the passage of endoscope: Expanding the horizon.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Comparison of Macintosh Laryngoscope, King VisionJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Miller Laryngoscope and the McGrath-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Direct Visualization of the Glottic Opening.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Ease of Intubation with McGrath Videolaryngoscope and Incidence of Adverse Events During Tracheal Intubation in COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023Article
- Should video laryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy be used for adults undergoing endotracheal intubation in the pre-hospital setting? A critical appraisal of a systematic review.Journal of paramedic practice : the clinical monthly for emergency care professionals · 2023Article
- A Comparative Study of Video Laryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation in Pediatric Patients.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2023Article
- Intubation characteristics using modified USB videolaryngoscope: A prospective, randomised study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023Article
- The relationship between years of anesthesia experience and first-time intubation success rate with direct laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in infants: a retrospective observational study.Journal of anesthesia · 2022Observational
- Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation of cardiac arrest patients in hospital: A systematic literature review.Resuscitation plus · 2022Review
- Optimization of Intraoperative Neural Monitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in Thyroid Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Comparison of paediatric King Vision™ videolaryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for elective tracheal intubation in children of age less than 1 year: A randomised clinical trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- Western Trauma Association critical decisions in trauma: airway management in adult trauma patients.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The approach to airway management has undergone a dramatic transformation since the advent of videolaryngoscopy (VL). Videolaryngoscopes have quickly gained popularity as an intubation device in a variety of clinical scenarios and settings, as well as in the hands of airway experts and non-experts. Their indirect view of upper airway improves glottic visualization, including in suspected or encountered difficult intubation. Yet, more studies are needed to determine whether VL actually improves endotracheal intubation (ETI) success rates, intubation times, and first attempt success rates; and thereby a potential replacement to traditional direct laryngoscopy. Furthermore, advances in technology have heralded a wide array of models each with their own strengths, weaknesses, and optimal applications. Such limitations need to be better understood and alternative strategies should be available. Thus, the role of VL continues to evolve. Though it is clear VL expands the armamentarium not only for anesthesiologists, but all healthcare providers potentially involved in airway management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.