Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740985›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2014

Polar delivery in plants; commonalities and differences to animal epithelial cells.

Urszula Kania, Matyaš Fendrych, Jiři Friml

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cell polarity: Regulators and mechanisms in plants.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification of factors required for mThe New phytologist · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Getting to the Right Side.Plant physiology · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Urszula KaniaInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria), 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Matyaš Fendrych
Jiři Friml
VIB-UGent Center for Plant Systems Biology · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although plant and animal cells use a similar core mechanism to deliver proteins to the plasma membrane, their different lifestyle, body organization and specific cell structures resulted in the acquisition of regulatory mechanisms that vary in the two kingdoms. In particular, cell polarity regulators do not seem to be conserved, because genes encoding key components are absent in plant genomes. In plants, the broad knowledge on polarity derives from the study of auxin transporters, the PIN-FORMED proteins, in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. In animals, much information is provided from the study of polarity in epithelial cells that exhibit basolateral and luminal apical polarities, separated by tight junctions. In this review, we summarize the similarities and differences of the polarization mechanisms between plants and animals and survey the main genetic approaches that have been used to characterize new genes involved in polarity establishment in plants, including the frequently used forward and reverse genetics screens as well as a novel chemical genetics approach that is expected to overcome the limitation of classical genetics methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell PolarityClathrinCytoskeletonEpithelial CellsMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsArabidopsis ProteinsClathrinMonomeric GTP-Binding ProteinsPIN3 protein, Arabidopsisepithelial cellsPIN proteinspolarityscreen

Identifiers

PMID24740985
PMCPMC4043115
OpenAlexW2117464718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.