Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740854›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Cellular mechanisms for response heterogeneity among L2/3 pyramidal cells in whisker somatosensory cortex.

Justin Elstrott, Kelly B Clancy, Haani Jafri, Igor Akimenko, Daniel E Feldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Inhibitory Circuits in Cortical Layer 5.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structure of a single whisker representation in layer 2 of mouse somatosensory cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justin ElstrottDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California; and.
Kelly B ClancyBiophysics PhD Program, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Haani JafriDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California; and.
Igor AkimenkoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California; and.
Daniel E FeldmanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California; and dfeldman@berkeley.edu.
University of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Tactile Sensation in Rodent Somatosensory CortexR01NS072416 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI FELDMAN, DANIEL · 2010 to 2014
$1.3M
Dendritic processing of feedforward sensory information in cerebral cortex.F32NS073279 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ELSTROTT, JUSTIN · 2011 to 2013
$135k
NINDS NIH HHS F32-NS-073279NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS-072416NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whisker deflection evokes sparse, low-probability spiking among L2/3 pyramidal cells in rodent somatosensory cortex (S1), with spiking distributed nonuniformly between more and less responsive cells. The cellular and local circuit factors that determine whisker responsiveness across neurons are unclear. To identify these factors, we used two-photon calcium imaging and loose-seal recording to identify more and less responsive L2/3 neurons in S1 slices in vitro, during feedforward recruitment of the L2/3 network by L4 stimulation. We observed a broad gradient of spike recruitment thresholds within local L2/3 populations, with low- and high-threshold cells intermixed. This recruitment gradient was significantly correlated across different L4 stimulation sites, and between L4-evoked and whisker-evoked responses in vivo, indicating that a substantial component of responsiveness is independent of tuning to specific feedforward inputs. Low- and high-threshold L2/3 pyramidal cells differed in L4-evoked excitatory synaptic conductance and intrinsic excitability, including spike threshold and the likelihood of doublet spike bursts. A gradient of intrinsic excitability was observed across neurons. Cells that spiked most readily to L4 stimulation received the most synaptic excitation but had the lowest intrinsic excitability. Low- and high-threshold cells did not differ in dendritic morphology, passive membrane properties, or L4-evoked inhibitory conductance. Thus multiple gradients of physiological properties exist across L2/3 pyramidal cells, with excitatory synaptic input strength best predicting overall spiking responsiveness during network recruitment.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, SomatosensoryAnimalsCalcium SignalingExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsInhibitory Postsynaptic PotentialsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPyramidal CellsRatsRats, Long-EvansSensory ThresholdsSomatosensory CortexVibrissaecortexmap plasticitysomatosensorysynaptic mechanismsvibrissa

Identifiers

PMID24740854
PMCPMC4064418
OpenAlexW2003079518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.