ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2014
Epilepsy: old syndromes, new genes.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Clocking Epilepsies: A Chronomodulated Strategy-Based Therapy for Rhythmic Seizures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Clinical, radiological, and genetic characterization ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Approach to Neurological Channelopathies and Neurometabolic Disorders in Newborns.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Overnight Video-Polysomnographic Studies in Children with Intractable Epileptic Encephalopathies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Audit of practice in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) post mortems and neuropathological findings.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2016Article
- The "urban myth" of the association between neurological disorders and vaccinations.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing technologies have tremendously increased the speed of gene discovery in monogenic epilepsies, enabling us to identify a genetic cause in an increasing proportion of patients, and to better understand the underlying pathophysiology of their disease. The rapid speed with which new genes are being described lately, confronts clinicians with the difficult task of keeping up to date with the continuous supply of new publications. This article aims to discuss some of the genes that were recently discovered in monogenic familial epilepsy syndromes or epileptic encephalopathies for which an underlying cause remained unknown for a long time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.