Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740371›Full record

Trial reportMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2014

Responder definition of the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale physical impact subscale for patients with physical worsening.

Glenn A Phillips, Kathleen W Wyrwich, Shien Guo, Rossella Medori, Arman Altincatal, Linda Wagner, Jacob Elkins

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Natalizumab for multiple sclerosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Lifestyle changes and patient-reported outcomes over five years in a sample of people with multiple sclerosis after a single multimodal intensive lifestyle education workshop.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Glenn A PhillipsHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Global Market Access, Biogen Idec, 133 Boston Post Road, Weston, MA 02493, USA glenn.phillips@biogenidec.com.
Kathleen W WyrwichEvidera, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Shien GuoEvidera, Lexington, MA, USA.
Rossella MedoriBiogen Idec, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Arman AltincatalEvidera, Lexington, MA, USA.
Linda WagnerEnvision Pharma Group, Southport, CT, USA.
Jacob ElkinsBiogen Idec, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) was developed to examine the impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) on physical and psychological functioning from a patient's perspective.

objectiveTo determine the responder definition (RD) of the MSIS-29 physical impact subscale (PHYS) in a group of patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) participating in a clinical trial.

methodsData from the SELECT trial comparing daclizumab high-yield process with placebo in patients with RRMS were used. Physical function was evaluated in SELECT using three patient-reported outcomes measures and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Anchor- and distribution-based methods were used to identify an RD for the MSIS-29.

resultsResults across the anchor-based approach suggested MSIS-29 PHYS RD values of 6.91 (mean), 7.14 (median) and 7.50 (mode). Distribution-based RD estimates ranged from 6.24 to 10.40. An RD of 7.50 was selected as the most appropriate threshold for physical worsening based on corresponding changes in the EDSS (primary anchor of interest).

conclusionThese findings indicate that a ≥7.50 point worsening on the MSIS-29 PHYS is a reasonable and practical threshold for identifying patients with RRMS who have experienced a clinically significant change in the physical impact of MS.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDaclizumabDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDaclizumabdaclizumab HYPImmunosuppressive Agentsanchor-based methoddistribution-based methodMSIS-29multiple sclerosispatient-reported outcomesphysical worseningResponder definitionSELECT

Identifiers

PMID24740371
PMCPMC4232315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.