Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740242›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Validity of hydration non-invasive indices during the weightcutting and official weigh-in for Olympic combat sports.

Valentín E Fernández-Elías, Alberto Martínez-Abellán, José María López-Gullón, Ricardo Morán-Navarro, Jesús G Pallarés, Ernesto De la Cruz-Sánchez, Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Gender Differences in Neuromuscular, Haematological and Urinary Responses during Padel Matches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reviewing the current methods of assessing hydration in athletes.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentín E Fernández-ElíasExercise Physiology Laboratory, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.
Alberto Martínez-AbellánDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
José María López-GullónDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Ricardo Morán-NavarroDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Jesús G PallarésExercise Physiology Laboratory, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain; Department of Physical Activity and Sport, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Ernesto De la Cruz-SánchezDepartment of Physical Activity and Sport, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Ricardo Mora-RodriguezExercise Physiology Laboratory, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Olympic combat sports, weight cutting is a common practice aimed to take advantage of competing in weight divisions below the athlete's normal weight. Fluid and food restriction in combination with dehydration (sauna and/or exercise induced profuse sweating) are common weight cut methods. However, the resultant hypohydration could adversely affect health and performance outcomes. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to determine which of the routinely used non-invasive measures of dehydration best track urine osmolality, the gold standard non-invasive test.

methodImmediately prior to the official weigh-in of three National Championships, the hydration status of 345 athletes of Olympic combat sports (i.e., taekwondo, boxing and wrestling) was determined using five separate techniques: i) urine osmolality (UOSM), ii) urine specific gravity (USG), iii) urine color (UCOL), iv) bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and v) thirst perception scale (TPS). All techniques were correlated with UOSM divided into three groups: euhydrated (G1; UOSM 250-700 mOsm · kg H2O(-1)), dehydrated (G2; UOSM 701-1080 mOsm · kg H2O(-1)), and severely dehydrated (G3; UOSM 1081-1500 mOsm · kg H2O(-1)).

resultsWe found a positive high correlation between the UOSM and USG (r = 0.89: p = 0.000), although this relationship lost strength as dehydration increased (G1 r = 0.92; G2 r = 0.73; and G3 r = 0.65; p = 0.000). UCOL showed a moderate although significant correlation when considering the whole sample (r = 0.743: p = 0.000) and G1 (r = 0.702: p = 0.000) but low correlation for the two dehydrated groups (r = 0.498-0.398). TPS and BIA showed very low correlation sizes for all groups assessed.

conclusionIn a wide range of pre-competitive hydration status (UOSM 250-1500 mOsm · kg H2O(-1)), USG is highly associated with UOSM while being a more affordable and easy to use technique. UCOL is a suitable tool when USG is not available. However, BIA or TPS are not sensitive enough to detect hypohydration at official weight-in before an Olympic combat championship.

Indexed as

AthletesWeight LossAdolescentAdultBoxingDehydrationFemaleHumansMaleOsmolar ConcentrationSportsThirstUrinalysisWrestling

Identifiers

PMID24740242
PMCPMC3989305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.