Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740196›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2014

A phase 2 trial of verubulin for recurrent glioblastoma: a prospective study by the Brain Tumor Investigational Consortium (BTIC).

Marc C Chamberlain, Sean Grimm, Surasak Phuphanich, Larry Recht, Jay Z Zhu, Lyndon Kim, Steve Rosenfeld, Camilo E Fadul, Brain Tumor Investigational Consortium (BTIC)

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Binding Parameters of [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Preliminary Evaluations of [Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. EfficientBeilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marc C ChamberlainSeattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, 825 Eastlake Ave E, MS: G4-940, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. chambemc@u.washington.edu.
Sean GrimmDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, 710 N Lake Shore Drive, Abbott Hall, Room 1110, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Surasak PhuphanichCedars Sinai Medical Center, 8631 W 3rd St, Ste 410-E, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Larry RechtStanford University, 875 Blake Wilbur Dr Rm 2221, Palo Alto, CA, 943042205, USA.
Jay Z ZhuTufts University, 750 Washington St, # 833, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Lyndon KimJefferson University, 900 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
Steve RosenfeldBrain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mailcode: NB40, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Camilo E FadulHematology/Oncology Section, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Brain Tumor Investigational Consortium (BTIC)

Funding

Translational Bioimaging Core Shared ResourceP30CA015704 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Marian Esvelt · 1985 to 2026
$296.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment options are limited for recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Verubulin is a microtubule destabilizer and vascular disrupting agent that achieve high brain concentration relative to plasma in animals. Adults with recurrent GBM who failed prior standard therapy were eligible. The primary endpoint was 1-month progression-free survival (PFS-1) for bevacizumab refractory (Group 2) and 6-month progression-free survival (PFS-6) for bevacizumab naïve patients (Group 1). Verubulin was administered at 3.3 mg/m(2) as a 2-h intravenous infusion once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks in a 4-week cycle. The planned sample size was 34 subjects per cohort. 56 patients (37 men, 19 women) were enrolled, 31 in Group 1 and 25 in Group 2. The PFS-6 for Group 1 was 14% and the PFS-1 for Group 2 was 20%. Median survival from onset of treatment was 9.5 months in Group 1 and 3.4 months in Group 2. Best overall response was partial response (n = 3; 10% in Group 1; n = 1; 4.2% in Group 2) and stable disease (n = 7; 23% in Group 1; n = 5; 21% in Group 2). In Group 1, 38.7% of patients experienced a serious adverse event; however only 3.2% were potentially attributable to study drug. In Group 2, 44% of patients experienced a serious adverse event although none were attributable to study drug. Accrual was terminated early for futility. Single agent verubulin, in this dose and schedule, is well tolerated, associated with moderate but tolerable toxicity but has limited activity in either bevacizumab naïve or refractory recurrent GBM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesQuinazolinesAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabQuinazolinesverubulin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.