Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740175›Full record

ReviewAdministration and policy in mental health2015

Measures for Predictors of Innovation Adoption.

Ka Ho Brian Chor, Jennifer P Wisdom, Su-Chin Serene Olin, Kimberly E Hoagwood, Sarah M Horwitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Administration and policy in mental health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ka Ho Brian ChorCenter for Mental Health Implementation and Dissemination Science in States for Children, Adolescents, and Families (IDEAS Center), Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Child Study Center, New York University School of Medicine, 1 Park Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA, brian.chor@nyumc.org.
Jennifer P Wisdom
Su-Chin Serene Olin
Kimberly E Hoagwood
Sarah M Horwitz

Funding

Research Methods CoreP30MH090322 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MCKAY, MARY MCKERNAN · 2011 to 2015
$8.1M
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH090322
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Building on a narrative synthesis of adoption theories by Wisdom et al. (2013), this review identifies 118 measures associated with the 27 adoption predictors in the synthesis. The distribution of measures is uneven across the predictors and predictors vary in modifiability. Multiple dimensions and definitions of predictors further complicate measurement efforts. For state policymakers and researchers, more effective and integrated measurement can advance the adoption of complex innovations such as evidence-based practices.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationEvidence-Based PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID24740175
PMCPMC4201641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.