Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740156›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

SNPs for parentage testing and traceability in globally diverse breeds of sheep.

Michael P Heaton, Kreg A Leymaster, Theodore S Kalbfleisch, James W Kijas, Shannon M Clarke, John McEwan, Jillian F Maddox, Veronica Basnayake, Dustin T Petrik, Barry Simpson and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Michael P HeatonU.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC), Clay Center, Nebraska, United States of America.
Kreg A LeymasterU.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC), Clay Center, Nebraska, United States of America.
Theodore S KalbfleischDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States of America.
James W KijasDivision of Animal, Food and Health Sciences, CSIRO, Brisbane, Australia.
Shannon M ClarkeAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Center, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
John McEwanAgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Center, Mosgiel, New Zealand.
Jillian F MaddoxMeat and Livestock Australia, North Sydney, Australia.
Veronica BasnayakeGeneSeek, a Neogen company, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
Dustin T PetrikGeneSeek, a Neogen company, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
Barry SimpsonGeneSeek, a Neogen company, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.
Timothy P L SmithU.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC), Clay Center, Nebraska, United States of America.
Carol G Chitko-McKownU.S. Meat Animal Research Center (USMARC), Clay Center, Nebraska, United States of America.
International Sheep Genomics Consortium

Funding

WKU Lead Faculty AwardP20GM103436 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI ERIC C ROUCHKA · 2012 to 2026
$60.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5P20GM103436-13NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA-based parentage determination accelerates genetic improvement in sheep by increasing pedigree accuracy. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers can be used for determining parentage and to provide unique molecular identifiers for tracing sheep products to their source. However, the utility of a particular "parentage SNP" varies by breed depending on its minor allele frequency (MAF) and its sequence context. Our aims were to identify parentage SNPs with exceptional qualities for use in globally diverse breeds and to develop a subset for use in North American sheep. Starting with genotypes from 2,915 sheep and 74 breed groups provided by the International Sheep Genomics Consortium (ISGC), we analyzed 47,693 autosomal SNPs by multiple criteria and selected 163 with desirable properties for parentage testing. On average, each of the 163 SNPs was highly informative (MAF≥0.3) in 48±5 breed groups. Nearby polymorphisms that could otherwise confound genetic testing were identified by whole genome and Sanger sequencing of 166 sheep from 54 breed groups. A genetic test with 109 of the 163 parentage SNPs was developed for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The scoring rates and accuracies for these 109 SNPs were greater than 99% in a panel of North American sheep. In a blinded set of 96 families (sire, dam, and non-identical twin lambs), each parent of every lamb was identified without using the other parent's genotype. In 74 ISGC breed groups, the median estimates for probability of a coincidental match between two animals (PI), and the fraction of potential adults excluded from parentage (PE) were 1.1×10(-39) and 0.999987, respectively, for the 109 SNPs combined. The availability of a well-characterized set of 163 parentage SNPs facilitates the development of high-throughput genetic technologies for implementing accurate and economical parentage testing and traceability in many of the world's sheep breeds.

Indexed as

PedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimalsBreedingFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic TestingGenotypeMaleReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNASheepSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

Identifiers

PMID24740156
PMCPMC3989260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.