Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24740074›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Profiling of rpoB mutations and MICs for rifampin and rifabutin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

F B Jamieson, J L Guthrie, A Neemuchwala, O Lastovetska, R G Melano, C Mehaffy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rapid detection of rifampin resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  11. Dissecting rifampicin heteroresistance inJournal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Correlation Between Xpert MTB/RIF Results andInfection and drug resistance · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Targeted next-generation sequencing ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F B JamiesonPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, ON, Canada.
J L GuthriePublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
A NeemuchwalaPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
O LastovetskaPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
R G MelanoPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, ON, Canada.
C MehaffyPublic Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada University of Toronto, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Toronto, ON, Canada Carolina.mehaffy@oahpp.ca.
Public Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resistance to rifampin (RIF) and rifabutin (RFB) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is associated with mutations within an 81-bp region of the rpoB gene (RIF resistance-determining region [RRDR]). Previous studies have shown that certain mutations in this region are more likely to confer high levels of RIF resistance, while others may be found in phenotypically susceptible isolates. In this study, we sought to determine the relationship between the MICs of RIF and RFB and rpoB RRDR mutations in 32 multidrug-resistant (MDR), 4 RIF-monoresistant, and 5 susceptible M. tuberculosis clinical isolates. The MICs were determined using the MGIT 960 system. Mutations in the rpoB RRDR were determined by Sanger sequencing. RpoB proteins with mutations S531L (a change of S to L at position 531), S531W, H526Y, and H526D and the double mutation D516A-R529Q were associated with high MICs for RIF and RFB. Five isolates carrying the mutations L511P, H526L, H526N, and D516G-S522L were found to be susceptible to RIF. Several mutations were associated with resistance to RIF and susceptibility to RFB (F514FF, D516V, and S522L). Whole-genome sequencing of two MDR isolates without rpoB RRDR mutations revealed a mutation outside the RRDR (V146F; RIF MIC of 50 μg/ml). The implications of the polymorphisms identified in the second of these isolates in RIF resistance need to be further explored. Our study further establishes a correlation between the mutations and the MICs of RIF and, also, RFB in M. tuberculosis. Several rpoB mutations were identified in RIF- and RFB-susceptible isolates. The clinical significance of these findings requires further exploration. Until then, a combination of phenotypic and molecular testing is advisable for drug susceptibility testing.

Indexed as

MutationAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesGenome, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycobacterium tuberculosisRifabutinRifampinSequence Analysis, DNATuberculosisAntitubercular AgentsBacterial ProteinsDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesRifabutinRifampinRNA polymerase beta subunitrpoB protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID24740074
PMCPMC4042728
OpenAlexW2081502785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.