Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2015
Can we identify response markers to antihypertensive drugs? First results from the IDEAL Trial.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00128518 (IDEAL Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
IDEAL Study : Identification of the Determinants of the Efficacy of Arterial Blood Pressure Lowering Drugs
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity in Blood Pressure Response to 4 Antihypertensive Drugs: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA · 2023Trial
- Differences in sex and age response to single pill combination based antihypertensive therapy reflecting in blood pressure and arterial stiffness.Journal of hypertension · 2025Article
- Polygenic scores for cardiovascular risk factors improve estimation of clinical outcomes in CCB treatment compared to pharmacogenetic variants alone.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2024Article
- Estrogen-mediated mechanisms in hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Review
- Sex differences in hypertension. Do we need a sex-specific guideline?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Hypertension Across a Woman's Life Cycle.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2018Review
- Antihypertensive drug treatment: the real-life challenge.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- Blood pressure response to metoprolol and chlorthalidone in European and African Americans with hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2017Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current antihypertensive strategies do not take into account that individual characteristics may influence the magnitude of blood pressure (BP) reduction. Guidelines promote trial-and-error approaches with many different drugs. We conducted the Identification of the Determinants of the Efficacy of Arterial blood pressure Lowering drugs (IDEAL) Trial to identify factors associated with BP responses to perindopril and indapamide. IDEAL was a cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, involving four 4-week periods: indapamide, perindopril and two placebo. Eligible patients were untreated, hypertensive and aged 25-70 years. The main outcome was systolic BP (SBP) response to drugs. The 112 participants with good compliance had a mean age of 52. One in every three participants was a woman. In middle-aged women, the SBP reduction from drugs was -11.5 mm Hg (indapamide) and -8.3 mm Hg (perindopril). In men, the response was significantly smaller: -4.8 mm Hg (indapamide) and -4.3 (perindopril) (P for sex differences 0.001 and 0.015, respectively). SBP response to perindopril decreased by 2 mm Hg every 10 years of age in both sexes (P=0.01). The response to indapamide increased by 3 mm Hg every 10 years of age gradient in women (P=0.02). Age and sex were important determinants of BP response for antihypertensive drugs in the IDEAL population. This should be taken into account when choosing drugs a priori.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24739801What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.