Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24739380›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2014

Women and academic medicine: a review of the evidence on female representation.

Maryse Penny, Rosanna Jeffries, Jonathan Grant, Sally C Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the lived experiences of early- and mid-career female academic GPs in the UK: a biographical narrative interview study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Top 100 Cited Articles in Otology and Neurotology and Analysis of Female Authorship.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Citation bias, diversity, and ethics.Accountability in research · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Gender Issues in Physiotherapy in Quebec, Canada.Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maryse PennyRAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK.
Rosanna JeffriesRAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK.
Jonathan GrantRAND Europe, Westbrook Centre, Milton Road, Cambridge, CB4 1YG, UK King's Policy Institute, King's College London, Strand Campus, London, WC2R 2LS, UK jonathan.grant@kcl.ac.uk.
Sally C DaviesDepartment of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London, SW1A 2NS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID24739380
PMCPMC4093756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.