Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24739175›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Observation of small cluster formation in concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions and its implications to solution viscosity.

Eric J Yearley, Paul D Godfrin, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Hailiang Zhang, Peter Falus, Lionel Porcar, Michihiro Nagao, Joseph E Curtis, Pradad Gawande, Rosalynn Taing and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antibodies Adsorbed to the Air-Water Interface Form Soft Glasses.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eric J YearleyCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Center for Neutron Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Paul D GodfrinCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Center for Neutron Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Tatiana PerevozchikovaCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Center for Neutron Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Hailiang ZhangCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Institute for Research and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Peter FalusInstitut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France.
Lionel PorcarInstitut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France.
Michihiro NagaoCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Center for Exploration of Energy and Matter, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.
Joseph E CurtisCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Pradad GawandeTheranos Inc., Palo Alto, California.
Rosalynn TaingLate Stage Pharmaceutical Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California.
Isidro E ZarragaLate Stage Pharmaceutical Development, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California. Electronic address: zarraga.isidro@gene.com.
Norman J WagnerDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Center for Neutron Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
Yun LiuCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland; Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Center for Neutron Science, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware. Electronic address: yunliu@udel.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a major class of biopharmaceuticals. It is hypothesized that some concentrated mAb solutions exhibit formation of a solution phase consisting of reversibly self-associated aggregates (or reversible clusters), which is speculated to be responsible for their distinct solution properties. Here, we report direct observation of reversible clusters in concentrated solutions of mAbs using neutron spin echo. Specifically, a stable mAb solution is studied across a transition from dispersed monomers in dilute solution to clustered states at more concentrated conditions, where clusters of a preferred size are observed. Once mAb clusters have formed, their size, in contrast to that observed in typical globular protein solutions, is observed to remain nearly constant over a wide range of concentrations. Our results not only conclusively establish a clear relationship between the undesirable high viscosity of some mAb solutions and the formation of reversible clusters with extended open structures, but also directly observe self-assembled mAb protein clusters of preferred small finite size similar to that in micelle formation that dominate the properties of concentrated mAb solutions.

Indexed as

Protein AggregatesAntibodies, MonoclonalElectrolytesHumansModels, MolecularProtein MultimerizationSaltsScattering, Small AngleSolutionsViscosityX-Ray DiffractionAntibodies, MonoclonalElectrolytesProtein AggregatesSaltsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID24739175
PMCPMC4008822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.