Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24739163›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

A critical evaluation of in silico methods for detection of membrane protein intrinsic disorder.

Edward E Pryor, Michael C Wiener

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Presence and structure-activity relationship of intrinsically disordered regions across mucins.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  3. DISOselect: Disorder predictor selection at the protein level.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Functions of intrinsic disorder in transmembrane proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  6. Quarterly intrinsic disorder digest (April-May-June, 2014).Intrinsically disordered proteins · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edward E PryorDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, Center for Membrane Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Michael C WienerDepartment of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, Center for Membrane Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: mwiener@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Multi-Level Optimization of Membrane Proteins for CrystallographyU54GM094611 · NIGMS · HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INST · PI DUMONT, MARK E. · 2010 to 2014
$6.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094611NIGMS NIH HHS U54-GM094611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered regions in proteins possess important biological roles including transcriptional regulation, molecular recognition, and provision of sites for posttranslational modification. In three-dimensional crystallization of both soluble and membrane proteins, identification and removal of disordered regions is often necessary for obtaining crystals possessing sufficient long-range order for structure determination. Disordered regions can be identified experimentally, with techniques such as limited proteolysis coupled with mass spectrometry, or computationally, by using disorder prediction programs, of which many are available. Although these programs use various methods to predict disorder from a protein's primary sequence, they all were developed using information derived from soluble protein structures. Therefore, their performance and accuracy when applied to integral membrane proteins remained an open question. We evaluated the performance of 13 disorder prediction programs on a dataset containing 343 membrane proteins, and upon subdatasets containing only α-helical or β-barrel proteins. These programs were ranked using multiple metrics, including metrics specifically created for membrane proteins. Analysis of these data shows a clear distinction between programs that accurately predict disordered regions in membrane proteins and programs which perform poorly, and allows for the robust integration of in silico disorder prediction into our PSI:Biology membrane protein structural genomics pipeline.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationArea Under CurveComputational BiologyCrystallizationDatabases, ProteinIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMembrane ProteinsProtein Structure, SecondarySolubilityIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24739163
PMCPMC4008797
OpenAlexW2070986217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.