Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24739073›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2014

Effect of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril on visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure: results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial.

Paul Muntner, Emily B Levitan, Amy I Lynch, Lara M Simpson, Jeffrey Whittle, Barry R Davis, John B Kostis, Paul K Whelton, Suzanne Oparil

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Asian expert consensus on high-quality hypertension management.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  10. Blood pressure variability: a review.Journal of hypertension · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cardiovascular Risk Factors: It's Time to Focus on Variability!Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Blood Pressure Variability and Therapeutic Implications in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Diseases.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul MuntnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Emily B Levitan
Amy I Lynch
Lara M Simpson
Jeffrey Whittle
Barry R Davis
John B Kostis
Paul K Whelton
Suzanne Oparil

Funding

CLINICAL TRIALS CENTER FOR ALLHAT-N01HC35130-268035130N01HC035130 · HC · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · 1993 to 2005
$6.3M
Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and CVD and renal outcomesR01HL110993 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI MUNTNER, PAUL · 2012 to 2014
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100036CNHLBI NIH HHS N01-HC-35130NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL110993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few randomized trials have compared visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) across drug classes. The authors compared VVV of SBP among 24,004 participants randomized to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). VVV of SBP was calculated across 5 to 7 visits occurring 6 to 28 months following randomization. The standard deviation (SD) of SBP was 10.6 (SD=5.0), 10.5 (SD=4.9), and 12.2 (SD=5.8) for participants randomized to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril, respectively. After multivariable adjustment including mean SBP across visits and compared with participants randomized to chlorthalidone, participants randomized to amlodipine had a 0.36 (standard error [SE]: 0.07) lower SD of SBP and participants randomized to lisinopril had a 0.77 (SE=0.08) higher SD of SBP. Results were consistent using other VVV of SBP metrics. These data suggest chlorthalidone and amlodipine are associated with lower VVV of SBP than lisinopril.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAgedAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationCalcium Channel BlockersChlorthalidoneDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionHypolipidemic AgentsLisinoprilAmlodipineAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersChlorthalidoneHypolipidemic AgentsLisinopril

Identifiers

PMID24739073
PMCPMC4141643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.