Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24738058›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

Adult neurogenesis and glial oncogenesis: when the process fails.

Chary Marquez Batista, Eric Domingos Mariano, Breno José Alencar Pires Barbosa, Matthias Morgalla, Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Guilherme Lepski

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Transcription Factors with Targeting Potential in Gliomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. The Astrogenic Balance in the Aging Brain.Current neuropharmacology · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Characterization of gliomas: from morphology to molecules.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chary Marquez BatistaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 455, LIM 15, 4th Floor, 01246-903 Cerqueira Cesar, SP, Brazil ; Center for Cellular and Molecular Studies and Therapy-NAP-NETCEM, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Eric Domingos MarianoDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 455, LIM 15, 4th Floor, 01246-903 Cerqueira Cesar, SP, Brazil ; Center for Cellular and Molecular Studies and Therapy-NAP-NETCEM, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Breno José Alencar Pires BarbosaDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 455, LIM 15, 4th Floor, 01246-903 Cerqueira Cesar, SP, Brazil.
Matthias MorgallaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Suely Kazue Nagahashi MarieDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 455, LIM 15, 4th Floor, 01246-903 Cerqueira Cesar, SP, Brazil ; Center for Cellular and Molecular Studies and Therapy-NAP-NETCEM, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Manoel Jacobsen TeixeiraDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 455, LIM 15, 4th Floor, 01246-903 Cerqueira Cesar, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme LepskiDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo 455, LIM 15, 4th Floor, 01246-903 Cerqueira Cesar, SP, Brazil ; Center for Cellular and Molecular Studies and Therapy-NAP-NETCEM, University of São Paulo, Brazil ; Department of Neurosurgery, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant brain tumors, including glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), are known for their high degree of invasiveness, aggressiveness, and lethality. These tumors are made up of heterogeneous cell populations and only a small part of these cells (known as cancer stem cells) is responsible for the initiation and recurrence of the tumor. The biology of cancer stem cells and their role in brain tumor growth and therapeutic resistance has been extensively investigated. Recent work suggests that glial tumors arise from neural stem cells that undergo a defective process of differentiation. The understanding of this process might permit the development of novel treatment strategies targeting cancer stem cells. In the present review, we address the mechanisms underlying glial tumor formation, paying special attention to cancer stem cells and the role of the microenvironment in preserving them and promoting tumor growth. Recent advancements in cancer stem cell biology, especially regarding tumor initiation and resistance to chemo- or radiotherapy, have led to the development of novel treatment strategies that focus on the niche of the stem cells that make up the tumor. Encouraging results from preclinical studies predict that these findings will be translated into the clinical field in the near future.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinogenesisHumansNeoplastic Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeuroglia

Identifiers

PMID24738058
PMCPMC3971505
OpenAlexW1969652242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.