Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24738038›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & medicine2014

Inhalation treatment of lung cancer: the influence of composition, size and shape of nanocarriers on their lung accumulation and retention.

Olga B Garbuzenko, Gediminas Mainelis, Oleh Taratula, Tamara Minko

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CaCurrent research in toxicology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Personalized Versus Precision Nanomedicine for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  7. Inhaled Nanoparticulate Systems: Composition, Manufacture and Aerosol Delivery.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Olga B Garbuzenko1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA ; 3 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331, USA ; 5 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Gediminas Mainelis1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA ; 3 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331, USA ; 5 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Oleh Taratula1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA ; 3 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331, USA ; 5 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Tamara Minko1 Department of Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 2 Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA ; 3 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA ; 4 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis 97331, USA ; 5 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Tracie Saunders · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
Multifunctional Nanotherapeutics for Cancer Treatment and ImagingR01CA138533 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MINKO, TAMARA · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Molecular Targeting of Drug Delivery System to CancerR01CA111766 · NCI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI MINKO, TAMARA · 2006 to 2010
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS R01 CA111766NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVarious nanoparticles have been designed and tested in order to select optimal carriers for the inhalation delivery of anticancer drugs to the lungs.

methodsTHE FOLLOWING NANOCARRIERS WERE STUDIED: micelles, liposomes, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), poly propyleneimine (PPI) dendrimer-siRNA complexes nanoparticles, quantum dots (QDs), and poly (ethylene glycol) polymers. All particles were characterized using the following methods: dynamic light scattering, zeta potential, atomic force microscopy, in vitro cyto- and genotoxicity. In vivo organ distribution of all nanoparticles, retention in the lungs, and anticancer effects of liposomes loaded with doxorubicin were examined in nude mice after the pulmonary or intravenous delivery.

resultsSignificant differences in lung uptake were found after the inhalation delivery of lipid-based and non-lipid-based nanoparticles. The accumulation of liposomes and micelles in lungs remained relatively high even 24 h after inhalation when compared with MSNs, QDs, and PPI dendrimers. There were notable differences between nanoparticle accumulation in the lungs and other organs 1 and 3 h after inhalation or intravenous administrations, but 24 h after intravenous injection all nanoparticles were mainly accumulated in the liver, kidneys, and spleen. Inhalation delivery of doxorubicin by liposomes significantly enhanced its anticancer effect and prevented severe adverse side effects of the treatment in mice bearing the orthotopic model of lung cancer.

conclusionThe results of the study demonstrate that lipid-based nanocarriers had considerably higher accumulation and longer retention time in the lungs when compared with non-lipid-based carriers after the inhalation delivery. These particles are most suitable for effective inhalation treatment of lung cancer.

Indexed as

drug delivery systemsinhalation administrationintravenous administrationlung neoplasmsNanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID24738038
PMCPMC3969800
OpenAlexW1494169801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.