SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2014
PLCE1 rs2274223 polymorphism contributes to risk of esophageal cancer: evidence based on a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The PLCE1 rs2274223 variant is associated with the risk of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Observational
- Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms inFrontiers in oncology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We sought to reassess the association of PLCE1 rs2274223 and susceptibility to esophageal cancer (EC) through a meta-analysis of published case-control studies. Using the PubMed and Embase, we identified nine articles including fourteen case-control studies (15,225 cases and 23,620 controls). ORs and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of GG vs. AA, GG + GA vs. AA, GG vs. GA + AA, G vs. A, and AG vs. AA genetic models were estimated for each study. All of the genetic models indicated a statistically significant positive association with EC risk. The association appeared most pronounced for carriers of GG genotype (GG vs. AA: OR, 1.35; 95 % CI, 1.17 to 1.57), and weakest for individuals carrying GA genotype (GA vs. AA: OR, 1.13; 95 % CI, 1.05 to 1.23). Stratification analyses showed similar results in the population of Asians and in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This meta-analysis provides strong statistical evidence for an elevated risk of EC associated with PLCE1 rs2274223. The association remains significant in Asian population and ESCC. Further investigations are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24737582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.