ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2014
Yield and utility of routine postoperative imaging after resection of brain metastases.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative CT scans after resection of brain metastases: neurosurgical routine or added value?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Routine postoperative computed tomography scan after craniotomy: systematic review and evidence-based recommendations.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Tumor-associated epilepsy in patients with brain metastases: necrosis-to-tumor ratio forecasts postoperative seizure freedom.Neurosurgical review · 2022Article
- MRI-Based Risk Assessment for Incomplete Resection of Brain Metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Review
- Article
- Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling shows high diagnostic performance in the detection of postoperative residual lesion in hyper-vascularised adult brain tumours.European radiology · 2020Article
- Is it all a matter of size? Impact of maximization of surgical resection in cerebral tumors.Neurosurgical review · 2019Review
- Risk factors for in-brain local progression in elderly patients after resection of cerebral metastases.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Is 5-ALA fluorescence of cerebral metastases a prognostic factor for local recurrence and overall survival?Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- The impact of cerebral metastases growth pattern on neurosurgical treatment.Neurosurgical review · 2018Review
- 5-ALA fluorescence of cerebral metastases and its impact for the local-in-brain progression.Oncotarget · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) is routinely performed after resection of brain metastases (BrM), regardless of whether there are specific clinical concerns about residual tumor or potential complications. Routine imaging studies contribute a significant amount to the cost of medical care, and their yield and utility are unknown. An IRB-approved retrospective chart review study was performed to analyze all craniotomies for BrM performed at our institution from 2005 to 2012. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the yield of postoperative imaging. 218 consecutive patients underwent 226 craniotomies for BrM. In 21 cases, new or worsened neurologic deficits occurred after surgery (9.0%), and 19 of the 21 underwent postoperative imaging. 9 of the 19 patients (47%) had significant findings on postoperative imaging, and 2 patients required reoperation. 201 patients had no new neurologic deficits (91%), and 23 of these patients had no postoperative imaging. Of the 178 remaining patients, 160 underwent postoperative MRI and 18 underwent postoperative CT. 9 patients (5.1%) had unexpected adverse imaging findings; 6 had small stroke, 1 had a subdural hemorrhage and 2 had possible or definite venous sinus occlusion. None of the imaging findings led to changes in management. 182 patients underwent imaging appropriate to detect residual tumor (177 gadolinium enhanced MRI and 5 contrast enhanced CT). Of these patients, 16 were known to have small residual tumors based on intraoperative findings. Of the remaining 166 patients felt to have had gross total tumor resection, 9 (5.4%) were found to have a small amount of residual tumor on postoperative imaging; no patient had a change in treatment plan as a result. Routine postoperative imaging in patients undergoing craniotomy for BrM has a very low yield and may not be appropriate in the absence of new neurologic deficits, or specific clinical concerns about large amounts of residual tumor or intraoperative complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.