Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24736830›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2014

Yield and utility of routine postoperative imaging after resection of brain metastases.

Ronald J Benveniste, Nicholas Ferraro, Asterios Tsimpas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald J BenvenisteDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace (D4-6), Miami, FL, 33136-1060, USA. rbenveniste@med.miami.edu.
Nicholas FerraroDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1095 NW 14th Terrace (D4-6), Miami, FL, 33136-1060, USA.
Asterios TsimpasDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Neurological Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) is routinely performed after resection of brain metastases (BrM), regardless of whether there are specific clinical concerns about residual tumor or potential complications. Routine imaging studies contribute a significant amount to the cost of medical care, and their yield and utility are unknown. An IRB-approved retrospective chart review study was performed to analyze all craniotomies for BrM performed at our institution from 2005 to 2012. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the yield of postoperative imaging. 218 consecutive patients underwent 226 craniotomies for BrM. In 21 cases, new or worsened neurologic deficits occurred after surgery (9.0%), and 19 of the 21 underwent postoperative imaging. 9 of the 19 patients (47%) had significant findings on postoperative imaging, and 2 patients required reoperation. 201 patients had no new neurologic deficits (91%), and 23 of these patients had no postoperative imaging. Of the 178 remaining patients, 160 underwent postoperative MRI and 18 underwent postoperative CT. 9 patients (5.1%) had unexpected adverse imaging findings; 6 had small stroke, 1 had a subdural hemorrhage and 2 had possible or definite venous sinus occlusion. None of the imaging findings led to changes in management. 182 patients underwent imaging appropriate to detect residual tumor (177 gadolinium enhanced MRI and 5 contrast enhanced CT). Of these patients, 16 were known to have small residual tumors based on intraoperative findings. Of the remaining 166 patients felt to have had gross total tumor resection, 9 (5.4%) were found to have a small amount of residual tumor on postoperative imaging; no patient had a change in treatment plan as a result. Routine postoperative imaging in patients undergoing craniotomy for BrM has a very low yield and may not be appropriate in the absence of new neurologic deficits, or specific clinical concerns about large amounts of residual tumor or intraoperative complications.

Indexed as

CraniotomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID24736830
OpenAlexW2082421368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.