Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24736740›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Experimentally induced stress validated by EMG activity.

Rosan Luijcks, Hermie J Hermens, Lonneke Bodar, Catherine J Vossen, Jim Van Os, Richel Lousberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosan LuijcksDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hermie J HermensRoessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Lonneke BodarDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Catherine J VossenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jim Van OsDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; King's Health Partners, King's College London, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom.
Richel LousbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLKings Health Partners · GBRoessingh Research and Development · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experience of stress may lead to increased electromyography (EMG) activity in specific muscles compared to a non-stressful situation. The main aim of this study was to develop and validate a stress-EMG paradigm in which a single uncontrollable and unpredictable nociceptive stimulus was presented. EMG activity of the trapezius muscles was the response of interest. In addition to linear time effects, non-linear EMG time courses were also examined. Taking into account the hierarchical structure of the dataset, a multilevel random regression model was applied. The stress paradigm, executed in N = 70 subjects, consisted of a 3-minute baseline measurement, a 3-minute pre-stimulus stress period and a 2-minute post-stimulus phase. Subjects were unaware of the precise moment of stimulus delivery and its intensity level. EMG activity during the entire experiment was conform a priori expectations: the pre-stimulus phase showed a significantly higher mean EMG activity level compared to the other two phases, and an immediate EMG response to the stimulus was demonstrated. In addition, the analyses revealed significant non-linear EMG time courses in all three phases. Linear and quadratic EMG time courses were significantly modified by subjective anticipatory stress level, measured just before the start of the stress task. Linking subjective anticipatory stress to EMG stress reactivity revealed that subjects with a high anticipatory stress level responded with more EMG activity during the pre-stimulus stress phase, whereas subjects with a low stress level showed an inverse effect. Results suggest that the stress paradigm presented here is a valid test to quantify individual differences in stress susceptibility. Further studies with this paradigm are required to demonstrate its potential use in mechanistic clinical studies.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyAdolescentAdultAgedAnticipation, PsychologicalElectric StimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNociceptionReproducibility of ResultsStress, PsychologicalSuperficial Back MusclesTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24736740
PMCPMC3988146
OpenAlexW1967949193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.