Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24736730›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Quantification of encapsulated bioburden in spacecraft polymer materials by cultivation-dependent and molecular methods.

Anja Bauermeister, Alexander Mahnert, Anna Auerbach, Alexander Böker, Niwin Flier, Christina Weber, Alexander J Probst, Christine Moissl-Eichinger, Klaus Haberer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anja BauermeisterCompliance Advice and Services in Microbiology GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Alexander MahnertDepartment for Microbiology and Archaea Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anna AuerbachDepartment for Microbiology and Archaea Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Alexander BökerLehrstuhl für Makromolekulare Materialien und Oberflächen (Macromolecular Materials and Surfaces), DWI at the RWTH Aachen e.V., RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Niwin FlierCompliance Advice and Services in Microbiology GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Christina WeberCompliance Advice and Services in Microbiology GmbH, Cologne, Germany; Lehrstuhl für Makromolekulare Materialien und Oberflächen (Macromolecular Materials and Surfaces), DWI at the RWTH Aachen e.V., RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Alexander J ProbstDepartment for Microbiology and Archaea Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christine Moissl-EichingerDepartment for Microbiology and Archaea Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Klaus HabererCompliance Advice and Services in Microbiology GmbH, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioburden encapsulated in spacecraft polymers (such as adhesives and coatings) poses a potential risk to jeopardize scientific exploration of other celestial bodies. This is particularly critical for spacecraft components intended for hard landing. So far, it remained unclear if polymers are indeed a source of microbial contamination. In addition, data with respect to survival of microbes during the embedding/polymerization process are sparse. In this study we developed testing strategies to quantitatively examine encapsulated bioburden in five different polymers used frequently and in large quantities on spaceflight hardware. As quantitative extraction of the bioburden from polymerized (solid) materials did not prove feasible, contaminants were extracted from uncured precursors. Cultivation-based analyses revealed <0.1-2.5 colony forming units (cfu) per cm3 polymer, whereas quantitative PCR-based detection of contaminants indicated considerably higher values, despite low DNA extraction efficiency. Results obtained from this approach reflect the most conservative proxy for encapsulated bioburden, as they give the maximum bioburden of the polymers irrespective of any additional physical and chemical stress occurring during polymerization. To address the latter issue, we deployed an embedding model to elucidate and monitor the physiological status of embedded Bacillus safensis spores in a cured polymer. Staining approaches using AlexaFluor succinimidyl ester 488 (AF488), propidium monoazide (PMA), CTC (5-cyano-2,3-diotolyl tetrazolium chloride) demonstrated that embedded spores retained integrity, germination and cultivation ability even after polymerization of the adhesive Scotch-Weld 2216 B/A. Using the methods presented here, we were able to estimate the worst case contribution of encapsulated bioburden in different polymers to the bioburden of spacecraft. We demonstrated that spores were not affected by polymerization processes. Besides Planetary Protection considerations, our results could prove useful for the manufacturing of food packaging, pharmacy industry and implant technology.

Indexed as

PolymersSpacecraftBacillusMicrobial ViabilitySolventsSpores, BacterialPolymersSolvents

Identifiers

PMID24736730
PMCPMC3988189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.