Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24736527›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2014

The clustering of CpG islands may constitute an important determinant of the 3D organization of interphase chromosomes.

Ekaterina S Gushchanskaya, Artem V Artemov, Sergey V Ulyanov, Maria D Logacheva, Aleksey A Penin, Elena S Kotova, Sergey B Akopov, Lev G Nikolaev, Olga V Iarovaia, Eugene D Sverdlov and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ekaterina S GushchanskayaInstitute of Gene Biology; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia; Department of Molecular Biology; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow, Russia; LIA 1066 French-Russian Joint Cancer Research Laboratory; Villejuif, France and Moscow, Russia.
Artem V ArtemovFaculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow, Russia; Institute for Information Transmission Problems; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia.
Sergey V UlyanovInstitute of Gene Biology; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia.
Maria D LogachevaLaboratory of Evolutionary Genomics; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow, Russia.
Aleksey A PeninLaboratory of Evolutionary Genomics; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow, Russia.
Elena S KotovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia.
Sergey B AkopovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia.
Lev G NikolaevShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia.
Olga V IarovaiaInstitute of Gene Biology; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia; LIA 1066 French-Russian Joint Cancer Research Laboratory; Villejuif, France and Moscow, Russia.
Eugene D SverdlovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia.
Alexey A GavrilovInstitute of Gene Biology; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia; LIA 1066 French-Russian Joint Cancer Research Laboratory; Villejuif, France and Moscow, Russia.
Sergey V RazinInstitute of Gene Biology; Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia; Department of Molecular Biology; Lomonosov Moscow State University; Moscow, Russia; LIA 1066 French-Russian Joint Cancer Research Laboratory; Villejuif, France and Moscow, Russia.
Russian Academy of Sciences · RUMoscow State University · TJLomonosov Moscow State University · RUDélégation Ile-de-France Villejuif · FRInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry · BYInstitute of Gene Biology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used the 4C-Seq technique to characterize the genome-wide patterns of spatial contacts of several CpG islands located on chromosome 14 in cultured chicken lymphoid and erythroid cells. We observed a clear tendency for the spatial clustering of CpG islands present on the same and different chromosomes, regardless of the presence or absence of promoters within these CpG islands. Accordingly, we observed preferential spatial contacts between Sp1 binding motifs and other GC-rich genomic elements, including the DNA sequence motifs capable of forming G-quadruplexes. However, an anchor placed in a gene/CpG island-poor area formed spatial contacts with other gene/CpG island-poor areas on chromosome 14 and other chromosomes. These results corroborate the two-compartment model of the spatial organization of interphase chromosomes and suggest that the clustering of CpG islands constitutes an important determinant of the 3D organization of the eukaryotic genome in the cell nucleus. Using the ChIP-Seq technique, we mapped the genome-wide CTCF deposition sites in the chicken lymphoid and erythroid cells that were used for the 4C analysis. We observed a good correlation between the density of CTCF deposition sites and the level of 4C signals for the anchors located in CpG islands but not for an anchor located in a gene desert. It is thus possible that CTCF contributes to the clustering of CpG islands observed in our experiments.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsInterphaseAnimalsChickensChromosomesErythroblastsLymphocytesMolecular ConformationPromoter Regions, Genetic4CCpG islandCTCFgenome spatial organizationhousekeeping gene

Identifiers

PMID24736527
PMCPMC4143410
OpenAlexW2138862299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.