Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24736475›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2014

High-risk HPV nucleic acid detection kit-the careHPV test -a new detection method for screening.

Hong Ying, Fang Jing, Zhao Fanghui, Qiao Youlin, Hu Yali

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular oncology testing in resource-limited settings.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong YingNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School; Nanjing Medical University; Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing 210008, China.
Fang JingNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School; Nanjing Medical University; Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing 210008, China.
Zhao FanghuiDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Hospital/Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 South Panjiayuan LaneP.O. Box 2258, Beijing 100021, China.
Qiao YoulinDepartment of Cancer Epidemiology, Cancer Hospital/Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 South Panjiayuan LaneP.O. Box 2258, Beijing 100021, China.
Hu YaliNanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School; Nanjing Medical University; Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine. 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing 210008, China.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed the clinical accuracy of the correlation between the careHPV test and the HC2 test, as well as the correlation between the careHPV test and the HPV-PCR test. From September 21 to December 31, 2009, 419 cervical specimens from women, 30-49 years, were collected. All women were assessed by Digene HC2 High-Risk HPV DNA Test (HC2), careHPV test, and HPV-PCR. The concordance rate between careHPV and HC2 was 93.81% and between careHPV and HPV-PCR 88.12%. The sensitivity and specificity of the careHPV test to detect cancers of equal or greater severity than CIN 2 were 85.71% and 83.15% respectively. Results from careHPV, HC2, and HPV-PCR were highly consistent. The careHPV test has good sensitivity and specificity for the detection of HPV infection and is a promising primary screening method for cervical cancer in low-resource regions.

Indexed as

Polymerase Chain ReactionAdultArea Under CurveCervix UteriDNA, ViralFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaeReagent Kits, DiagnosticROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical NeoplasmsDNA, ViralReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID24736475
PMCPMC3988477
OpenAlexW2050470199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.