Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24734538›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical nanotechnology2014

In vivo imaging of infection using a bacteria-targeting optical nanoprobe.

Ewin N Tang, Ashwin Nair, David W Baker, Wenjing Hu, Jun Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical nanotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent Progress in the Molecular Imaging of Tumor-Treating Bacteria.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Optical Identification of Middle Ear Infection.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  8. Imaging in Chronic Wound Diagnostics.Advances in wound care · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Optical imaging of bacterial infections.Clinical and translational imaging
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ewin N Tang
Ashwin Nair
David W Baker
Wenjing Hu
Jun Zhou

Funding

A novel optical imaging probe system for assessing wound healing and infectionR43AR064650 · NIAMS · PROGENITEC, INC. · PI HU, WENJING · 2013 to 2013
$200k
NIAMS NIH HHS R43 AR064650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound and device-associated infection is a leading cause for morbidity and mortality. As such, rapid and early diagnosis of bacterial colonization is critical to infection treatment. The current diagnostic methods however, are not able to meet this requirement. Therefore, there is a practical need for the development of a new method to rapidly identify colonized bacteria. This study aims to develop optical nanoprobes that can detect and quantify the number of colonized bacteria in real time. To this end, we have synthesized an imaging nanoprobe with three elements: Concanavalin A (Con A) as a bacterial targeting ligand, a nanoparticle carrier, and a near infrared fluorescent dye. An MTS assay revealed that the bacteria nanoprobe is cell compatible. In vitro testing further showed that the bacteria nanoprobe had a very high specificity and affinity to bacteria. Using a murine wound and catheter infection model, we found that the bacteria nanoprobes can rapidly detect and quantify the extent of bacterial colonization on wounds and catheters in real time.

Indexed as

Molecular Probe TechniquesNanoparticlesAnimalsColony Count, MicrobialFemaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicroscopy, FluorescenceReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID24734538
PMCPMC5033601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.