Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24734254›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

Commentary on the regulation of viral proteins in autophagy process.

Ching-Yuan Cheng, Pei-I Chi, Hung-Jen Liu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Autophagy and Viral Infection.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ching-Yuan ChengInstitute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Pei-I ChiInstitute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.
Hung-Jen LiuInstitute of Molecular Biology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan ; Agricultural Biotechnology Center, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan ; Rong Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1460-1494
National Chung Hsing University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to subvert intracellular antiviral defenses is necessary for virus to survive as its replication occurs only in the host cells. Viruses have to modulate cellular processes and antiviral mechanisms to their own advantage during the entire virus life cycle. Autophagy plays important roles in cell regulation. Its function is not only to catabolize aggregate proteins and damaged organelles for recycling but also to serve as innate immunity to remove intracellular pathogenic elements such as viruses. Nevertheless, some viruses have evolved to negatively regulate autophagy by inhibiting its formation. Even more, some viruses have employed autophagy to benefit their replication. To date, there are more and more growing evidences uncovering the functions of many viral proteins to regulate autophagy through different cellular pathways. In this review, we will discuss the relationship between viruses and autophagy and summarize the current knowledge on the functions of viral proteins contributing to affect autophagy process.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsAntiviral AgentsGene Expression Regulation, ViralHumansImmunity, InnateMiceSignal TransductionViral ProteinsVirus DiseasesAntiviral AgentsViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24734254
PMCPMC3966343
OpenAlexW2053462115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.