Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24734136›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2014

Home blood pressure monitoring, secure electronic messaging and medication intensification for improving hypertension control: a mediation analysis.

J D Ralston, A J Cook, M L Anderson, S L Catz, P A Fishman, J Carlson, R Johnson, B B Green

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Adult patient access to electronic health records.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pharmacist involvement in a comprehensive remote monitoring and telemanagement program.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The current state and future of internet technology-based hypertension management in Japan.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J D RalstonGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
A J CookGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
M L AndersonGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
S L CatzGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
P A FishmanGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
J CarlsonGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
R JohnsonGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
B B GreenGroup Health Research Institute 1730 Minor Ave , Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
Group Health Cooperative · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe evaluated the role of home monitoring, communication with pharmacists, medication intensification, medication adherence and lifestyle factors in contributing to the effectiveness of an intervention to improve blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension.

methodsWe performed a mediation analysis of a published randomized trial based on the Chronic Care Model delivered over a secure patient website from June 2005 to December 2007. Study arms analyzed included usual care with a home blood pressure monitor and usual care with home blood pressure monitor and web-based pharmacist care. Mediator measures included secure messaging and telephone encounters; home blood pressure monitoring; medications intensification and adherence and lifestyle factors. Overall fidelity to the Chronic Care Model was assessed with the Patient Assessment of Chronic Care (PACIC) instrument. The primary outcome was percent of participants with blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mm Hg.

resultsAt 12 months follow-up, patients in the web-based pharmacist care group were more likely to have BP <140/90 mm Hg (55%) compared to patients in the group with home blood pressure monitors only (37%) (p = 0.001). Home blood pressure monitoring accounted for 30.3% of the intervention effect, secure electronic messaging accounted for 96%, and medication intensification for 29.3%. Medication adherence and self-report of fruit and vegetable intake and weight change were not different between the two study groups. The PACIC score accounted for 22.0 % of the main intervention effect.

conclusionsThe effect of web-based pharmacist care on improved blood pressure control was explained in part through a combination of home blood pressure monitoring, secure messaging, and antihypertensive medication intensification.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryNegotiatingAntihypertensive AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineAntihypertensive Agentshome care and e-healthinternet portalpatient-provider communicationpatient self-carePersonal health recordsremote monitoringtelemedicine and telehealth

Identifiers

PMID24734136
PMCPMC3974258
OpenAlexW1895752644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.