Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733928›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Tumor microenvironment-based feed-forward regulation of NOS2 in breast cancer progression.

Julie L Heinecke, Lisa A Ridnour, Robert Y S Cheng, Christopher H Switzer, Michael M Lizardo, Chand Khanna, Sharon A Glynn, S Perwez Hussain, Howard A Young, Stefan Ambs and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. NCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Julie L HeineckeRadiation Biology Branch, Tumor and Metastasis Biology Section, Pediatric Oncology Branch, and Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Lisa A Ridnour
Robert Y S Cheng
Christopher H Switzer
Michael M Lizardo
Chand Khanna
Sharon A Glynn
S Perwez Hussain
Howard A Young
Stefan Ambs
David A Wink
National Institutes of Health · USPediatric Oncology Group · CANational Cancer Institute · USOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

Novel Markers for Disease Outcome in Breast CancerZIABC010887 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI AMBS, STEFAN · 2009 to 2025
$11.5M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation is widely recognized as an inducer of cancer progression. The inflammation-associated enzyme, inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2), has emerged as a candidate oncogene in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, and its increased expression is associated with disease aggressiveness and poor survival. Although these observations implicate NOS2 as an attractive therapeutic target, the mechanisms of both NOS2 induction in tumors and nitric oxide (NO)-driven cancer progression are not fully understood. To enhance our mechanistic understanding of NOS2 induction in tumors and its role in tumor biology, we used stimulants of NOS2 expression in ER(-) and ER(+) breast cancer cells and examined downstream NO-dependent effects. Herein, we show that up-regulation of NOS2 occurs in response to hypoxia, serum withdrawal, IFN-γ, and exogenous NO, consistent with a feed-forward regulation of NO production by the tumor microenvironment in breast cancer biology. Moreover, we found that key indicators of an aggressive cancer phenotype including increased S100 calcium binding protein A8, IL-6, IL-8, and tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase-1 are up-regulated by these NOS2 stimulants, whereas inhibition of NOS2 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells suppressed these markers. Moreover, NO altered cellular migration and chemoresistance of MDA-MB-231 cells to Taxol. Most notably, MDA-MB-231 tumor xenographs and cell metastases from the fat pad to the brain were significantly suppressed by NOS2 inhibition in nude mice. In summary, these results link elevated NOS2 to signals from the tumor microenvironment that arise with cancer progression and show that NO production regulates chemoresistance and metastasis of breast cancer cells.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionFeedback, PhysiologicalTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell HypoxiaCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCulture Media, Serum-FreeDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGuanidinesHumansInterferon-gammaBiomarkers, TumorCulture Media, Serum-FreeGuanidinesInterferon-gammaNitric OxideNitric Oxide Synthase Type IINOS2 protein, humanpimagedine

Identifiers

PMID24733928
PMCPMC4035989
OpenAlexW2031830523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.