Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733912›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Enhanced evolution by stochastically variable modification of epigenetic marks in the early embryo.

Sergio Branciamore, Andrei S Rodin, Arthur D Riggs, Sergei N Rodin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Phyloepigenetics.Biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Frequent monoallelic or skewed expression for developmental genes in CNS-derived cells and evidence for balancing selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Genomic landscape of CpG rich elements in human.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio BranciamoreDepartment of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases Research, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010.
Andrei S Rodin
Arthur D Riggs
Sergei N Rodin
Beckman Research InstituteCity of Hope · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution by gene duplication is generally accepted as one of the crucial driving forces for the gain of new complexity and functions, but the formation of pseudogenes remains a problem for this mechanism. Here we expand on earlier ideas that epigenetic modifications can drive neo- and subfunctionalization in evolution by gene duplication. We explore the effects of stochastic epigenetic modifications on the evolution (and thus development) of complex organisms in a constant environment. Modeling is done both using a modified genetic drift analytical treatment and computer simulations, which were found to agree. A transposon silencing model is also explored. Some key assumptions made include (i) stochastic, incomplete removal (or addition) of repressive epigenetic marks takes place during a window(s) of opportunity in the zygote and early embryo; (ii) there is no statistical variation of the marks after the window closes; and (iii) the genes affected are sensitive to dosage. Our genetic drift treatment takes into account that after gene duplication the prevailing case upon which selection operates is a duplicate/singlet heterozygote; to the best of our knowledge, this has not been considered in previous treatments. We conclude from our modeling that stochastic epigenetic modifications, with rates consistent with experimental observation, can both increase the rate of gene fixation and decrease pseudogenization, thus dramatically improving the efficacy of evolution by gene duplication. We also find that a transposon silencing model is advantageous for fixation of recessive genes in diploid organisms, especially with large effective population sizes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsComputer SimulationDiffusionDNA Transposable ElementsEmbryo, MammalianGene DuplicationGenetic LociGenotypeMiceModels, GeneticPhenotypePseudogenesStochastic ProcessesDNA Transposable Elementscomputational biologydevelopmental biologyDNA methylationmathematical modelingmolecular evolution

Identifiers

PMID24733912
PMCPMC4035958
OpenAlexW2067351244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.