ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014
Enhanced evolution by stochastically variable modification of epigenetic marks in the early embryo.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phylo-Epigenetic Conservation and CpG Erosion inGenes · 2025Article
- Stochastic Epigenetic Modification and Evolution of Sex Determination in Vertebrates.Journal of molecular evolution · 2024Article
- Article
- Phyloepigenetics.Biology · 2022Article
- Epigenetic variation in animal populations: Sources, extent, phenotypic implications, and ecological and evolutionary relevance.Journal of biosciences · 2021Review
- An Aptitude for Altitude: Are Epigenomic Processes Involved?Frontiers in physiology · 2019Review
- Article
- Frequent monoallelic or skewed expression for developmental genes in CNS-derived cells and evidence for balancing selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance.Interface focus · 2017Review
- Genomic landscape of CpG rich elements in human.BMC evolutionary biology · 2017Article
- Facilitation of environmental adaptation and evolution by epigenetic phenotype variation: insights from clonal, invasive, polyploid, and domesticated animals.Environmental epigenetics · 2017Review
- Epigenetic assimilation in the aging human brain.Genome biology · 2016Article
- A Comparative Epigenomic Analysis of Polyploidy-Derived Genes in Soybean and Common Bean.Plant physiology · 2015Article
- Evolution of an epigenetic gene ensemble within the genus Anopheles.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evolution by gene duplication is generally accepted as one of the crucial driving forces for the gain of new complexity and functions, but the formation of pseudogenes remains a problem for this mechanism. Here we expand on earlier ideas that epigenetic modifications can drive neo- and subfunctionalization in evolution by gene duplication. We explore the effects of stochastic epigenetic modifications on the evolution (and thus development) of complex organisms in a constant environment. Modeling is done both using a modified genetic drift analytical treatment and computer simulations, which were found to agree. A transposon silencing model is also explored. Some key assumptions made include (i) stochastic, incomplete removal (or addition) of repressive epigenetic marks takes place during a window(s) of opportunity in the zygote and early embryo; (ii) there is no statistical variation of the marks after the window closes; and (iii) the genes affected are sensitive to dosage. Our genetic drift treatment takes into account that after gene duplication the prevailing case upon which selection operates is a duplicate/singlet heterozygote; to the best of our knowledge, this has not been considered in previous treatments. We conclude from our modeling that stochastic epigenetic modifications, with rates consistent with experimental observation, can both increase the rate of gene fixation and decrease pseudogenization, thus dramatically improving the efficacy of evolution by gene duplication. We also find that a transposon silencing model is advantageous for fixation of recessive genes in diploid organisms, especially with large effective population sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.