Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24733881›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2014

Prenatal SSRI use and offspring with autism spectrum disorder or developmental delay.

Rebecca A Harrington, Li-Ching Lee, Rosa M Crum, Andrew W Zimmerman, Irva Hertz-Picciotto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca A HarringtonDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and rharring@jhsph.edu.
Li-Ching LeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and.
Rosa M CrumDepartments of Epidemiology, Psychiatry, and Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland;
Andrew W ZimmermanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts; and.
Irva Hertz-PicciottoDepartment of Public Health Sciences and the MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.

Funding

THE CHARGE STUDY: CHILDHOOD AUTISM RISKS FROM GENETICS AND THE ENVIRONMENT - ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPLEMENTR01ES015359 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HERTZ-PICCIOTTO, IRVA · 2007 to 2019
$13.8M
UC Davis Center for Children's Environmental Health (CCEH)P01ES011269 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI VAN DE WATER, JUDY A. · 2001 to 2018
$12.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES011269NIEHS NIH HHS P01-ES11269NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015359NIEHS NIH HHS R01-ES015359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine associations between prenatal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the odds of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and other developmental delays (DDs).

methodsA total of 966 mother-child pairs were evaluated (492 ASD, 154 DD, 320 typical development [TD]) from the Childhood Autism Risks from Genetics and the Environment (CHARGE) Study, a population-based case-control study. Standardized measures confirmed developmental status. Interviews with biological mothers ascertained prenatal SSRI use, maternal mental health history, and sociodemographic information.

resultsOverall, prevalence of prenatal SSRI exposure was lowest in TD children (3.4%) but did not differ significantly from ASD (5.9%) or DD (5.2%) children. Among boys, prenatal SSRI exposure was nearly 3 times as likely in children with ASD relative to TD (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-7.93); the strongest association occurred with first-trimester exposure (OR: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.17-8.84). Exposure was also elevated among boys with DD (OR: 3.39; 95% CI: 0.98-11.75) and was strongest in the third trimester (OR: 4.98; 95% CI: 1.20-20.62). Findings were similar among mothers with an anxiety or mood disorder history.

conclusionsIn boys, prenatal exposure to SSRIs may increase susceptibility to ASD or DD. Findings from published studies on SSRIs and ASD continues to be inconsistent. Potential recall bias and residual confounding by indication are concerns. Larger samples are needed to replicate DD results. Because maternal depression itself carries risks for the fetus, the benefits of prenatal SSRI use should be carefully weighed against potential harms.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsCaliforniaCase-Control StudiesChild Development Disorders, PervasiveChild, PreschoolDevelopmental DisabilitiesDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansMaleOdds RatioPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy Trimester, ThirdSex Factorsautismdevelopmental delayepidemiologypregnancyselective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24733881
PMCPMC4006441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.