ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2014
MRI and cardiac implantable electronic devices; current status and required safety conditions.
Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI image quality in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Is diversity harmful?-Mixed-brand cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2022Article
- Current Status and Issues Concerning Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with a Magnetic Resonance Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electrical Device: A Single-center Study.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Feasibility, safety, and utility of brain MRI for patients with non-MRI-conditioned CIED.Neurosurgical review · 2020Article
- Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017Review
- Feasibility, safety, and potential demand of emergent brain magnetic resonance imaging of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices.Journal of arrhythmia · 2017Article
- The role of cardiac imaging in clinical practice.Australian prescriber · 2017Review
- Utilization and likelihood of radiologic diagnostic imaging in patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2016Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging safety in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: how far have we come?European heart journal · 2015Review
- Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients eligible for ICD therapy: Discrepancy between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 2D echocardiography.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2014Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging and devices: a mesmerising combination.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved into an essential diagnostic modality for the evaluation of all patient categories. This gain in popularity coincided with an increase in the number of implanted cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Therefore, questions arose with regard to the MRI compatibility of these devices. Various investigators have reported the harmless performance of MRI in patients with conventional (non-MRI conditional) devices. The recently published European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) indicate that MRI can be safely performed in patients with an implanted pacemaker or ICD (MRI conditional or not), as long as strict safety conditions are met. This is a major modification of the former general opinion that patients with a pacemaker or ICD were not eligible to undergo MRI. This review paper attempts to elucidate the current situation for practising cardiologists by providing a clear overview of the potential life-threatening interactions and discuss safety measures to be taken prior to and during scanning. An overview of all available MRI conditional devices and their individual restrictions is given. In addition, an up-to-date safety protocol is provided that can be used to ensure patient safety before, during and after the scan. Key points • Historically, MRI examination of patients with a CIED has been considered hazardous. • Ongoing advances in technology and increasing usage of MRI in clinical practice have led to the introduction of MRI conditional CIEDs and to more lenient regulations on the examination of patients with non-conditional CIEDs. • MRI investigations can be performed safely in selected patients when adhering to a standardised up-to-date safety protocol.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.